Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Quark2005
"You wouldn't know science if it sat on your face"

The crap your kind want to call science is all over your face. I'll stick with the real kind that produces usable results.

{"You don't even believe in surgery, for God's sake"

You have demonstrated that you have no idea what I believe in. I have stated numerous times that trauma surgery is quite acceptable; it's the fraud called cancer surgery that has to be rejected, and surgery is never for God's sake.

"or that the earth is over 5000 years old"

You really do have limited intelligence, don't you!
All the non-circular data put the Earth at around 6000 years old.

We're all aware that anyone that doesn't fall for the fairy tales is a crank in your one page book. FR fits in quite well with the country as a whole. We reject the garbage that spews out of the foul mouths of of jerks like you at the same rate that the rest of the country does. PH's polls have proven that. I deal with real data every day, and that is what gives me a firm foundation from which to refute your flatulence.

120 posted on 12/12/2006 6:04:39 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor
All the non-circular data put the Earth at around 6000 years old.

The scientific evidence is clear on the age of the earth. Many lines of evidence place it far older than 6,000 years. No scientific evidence places it even close to 6,000 years. The "young earth" idea comes entirely from religious belief, and an extreme minority belief at that.


PH's polls have proven that.

PH ran no polls. The poll you are erroneously thinking of was a FR poll, from which PH merely synopsized the results every day or so. (This is just another in your long line of mistakes.)

For the lurkers, here are a couple of excellent links.

PatrickHenry's List-O-Links (now the Un-Missing Links).

Index of Creationist Claims in which several hundred of the most common misrepresentations of creationists are numbered and rebutted. I particularly like CA221.


126 posted on 12/12/2006 6:29:22 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor
All the non-circular data put the Earth at around 6000 years old.

Scriptural timing puts it at between 6,006 and 7,506 years ago.

144 posted on 12/13/2006 6:37:33 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

In your post #120, you stated, "The fraud called cancer surgery that has to be rejected, and surgery is never for God's sake."...

What would you use in place of cancer surgery, if one is diagnosed with a cancerous tumor, that could easily be removed?...I am curious as to what alternatives you would suggest, should one find themselves diagnosed with such a tumor...


165 posted on 12/13/2006 1:08:23 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

To: editor-surveyor

And as a followup to my post #165....I take it that you believe that any surgery that is not trauma surgery, goes against the God...do you have Scriptures to back this up?...I am curious to see where in the Bible, one finds this notion...maybe you could point out a few Scriptures which detail this, and I am sure that it would be helpful to see where in the Bible, you have found this...


166 posted on 12/13/2006 1:18:23 PM PST by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson