Posted on 12/12/2006 6:19:34 AM PST by Bulldawg Fan
(CNSNews.com) - Christian military officers who share their faith at work in the Pentagon pose a threat to national security, according to a group that advocates for religious neutrality in the military.
Public displays of faith by high-ranking military officers project an image of a Christian nation waging war on non-Christians, both inside and outside the United States, the Military Religious Freedom Foundation said Monday.
This created an "internal national security issue every bit as great as the one we're fighting outwardly," said the organization's president, Mikey Weinstein.
"The jihadists, the insurrectionists, everybody from the head of Hamas, Hizballah, the Islamic Jihad, the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, they see us as invading American imperialists and crusaders," he told a news conference in Washington, D.C.
Weinstein, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy who has been critical of proselytizing at the academy, called for an investigation into several officers who appeared in a promotional video for a Christian organization while in uniform.
In addition to creating a national security threat, Weinstein said, evangelistic efforts by Christian officers directed toward their colleagues or subordinates amounted to "coercion" and "fanatical unconstitutional religious persecution."
"There's a time and place to celebrate your faith or no faith," Weinstein said. "There's so many times and places you can do it ... but there's a few times you can't, one of which would be when you wear your uniform during the duty day and duty night and you outrank somebody else and you're trying to push your religious faith on them."
He called on incoming Defense Secretary Robert Gates to investigate a promotional video for the Christian Embassy, an organization that ministers to members of Congress, ambassadors, presidential appointees and Pentagon officials.
Christian Embassy, established in 1975, works with government leaders "not only because of their personal needs, but also because of their position as decision-makers to influence our families and freedoms," according to its website. At the Pentagon, the group holds weekly prayer meetings and Bible studies every weekday.
In the promotional video cited by Weinstein, four generals and three colonels appear wearing their uniforms. Among them is Lt. Col. Lucious Morton, who says that Christian Embassy-led Bible studies benefit the military as a whole because they create "Godly men" who will lead others into battle.
Maj. Gen. Jack Catton also appears in the video and says he shares his faith with people he meets in his office: "I start with the fact that I'm an old-fashioned American, and my first priority is my faith in God, then my family, and then my country."
Weinstein said the video raises questions about whether the officers followed military regulations that restrict appearances in uniform for non-military purposes.
Their professions of faith violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which prohibits Congress from making laws "respecting the establishment of religion," he argued.
The video, which appears on Christian Embassy's website, carries a disclaimer that says "the views expressed by any government officials in this video are their personal views and are not intended to represent the U.S. government nor any department in which they serve."
Catton, director of requirements for Air Combat Command (ACC) at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia, has been criticized for sharing his faith before. Last May, he used his military e-mail account to support a retired general who was running for U.S. Congress.
In that e-mail, Catton wrote: "We are certainly in need of Christian men with integrity and military experience in Congress."
Lt. Col Brian Maka, a spokesman for the DOD inspector general, declined to comment Monday on whether an investigation is underway, although media reports in May suggested that there was.
'No evidence of coercion'
Maj. Laurel Tingley, a spokeswoman for ACC, told Cybercast News Service Catton would not be commenting about the video because "it's going to be something bigger than Air Combat Command or even something bigger than the Air Force." She referred further questions to the Department of Defense.
Maj. Stewart Upton said Monday the DOD inspector general's office had received the complaint from Weinstein's group but added that it would be "inappropriate ... for us to speculate as to what, if any, actions will be taken at this point."
Upton added that DOD "does not endorse any one religion or religious organization but we do provide opportunities for military service members to practice their faiths."
Calls placed to Christian Embassy requesting comment for this report were not returned Monday.
Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, criticized Weinstein for asking the DOD inspector general's office to spend time investigating the video.
She said that because the video is accompanied by a disclaimer and does not ask for money, it doesn't raise concern with her.
"The Department of Defense inspector general has an awful lot of issues on their plate, on their agenda, and I don't see this as something so important that everything else should be put on hold," Donnelly told Cybercast News Service after viewing the video. "The DOD IG has a lot more important things to do."
She called it a "stretch to talk about anything coercive," noting that a soldier engaging in religious activity such as prayer "appears to be purely voluntary on the part of anyone who wants to participate."
"I don't see any evidence that this is a coercive type of environment," Donnelly said.
It is correct, you are employed by the Military 24 and 7, altho you do have time for yourself and for relaxation, you are on Duty 24 and 7, 365 days a year.
I'm sure he's a card-carrying ACLU member.
"The military distinguishes on-duty and off-duty, and does provide many accommodations to religious practices. However, there are many restrictions that distinguish when and where religious practices are authorized."
Restricting the practice of religion can be construed as denying a service man the right to pray or read his scriptures before going into battle. Shall we do that also? They are on duty (btw they are on duty 24 and 7, otherwise their Liberty and Leave cannot be cancelled for reasons known only to the command, and the command Can and does do that).
"For example, proselytizing is completely forbidden in the entire overseas CENTCOM region of operations. And any extraneous conversation may be restricted during a mission cycle, for obvious reasons."
Agreed, no argument there.
"If objections are made by someone who has been approached to discuss religion, then the advocate may be directed to not approach them again."
Agreed, again no argument there.
I sure hope you are right.
BFLR = Bump for later reading
Hey, the Army denied me and my buddies that right all the time when we were in Vietnam. We couldn't read scriptures (or anything else not directly related to the mission at hand) when we were on perimeter sentry duty, engaging in a Mad Minute while Mr. Charles was paying us a social call, or delivering suporting fires to friendly units.
A hypothetical case for you:
Private Willie Lump-Lump's religion requires him, just before going into battle, to light a bonfire and prosletyze all within 100 yards of my position, maintaining sufficient volume in his voice that all within 100 yards may clearly understand what he is saying.
A requirement to maintain light and noise discipline, therefore, by your construction, would be an unreasonable infringement on Private Lump-Lump's religious freedom.
But one can't expect the likes of sniviling little pr!cks like Mikey Weinstein to see that. It is to the utter shame of the AF Academy they graduated a twerp like that.
Its not accident that the AF Academy has been ground zero for this fight. With Cadets like Mikey, its a wonder they even take a break for Chirs.......Winter.
Despite heavy vetting, klinkers do sometimes get through. It is the same with all the Service Academies. Usually idiots like this get weeded out in the four years there, but not always. This guy Mikey apparently has an ACLU lawyer type for a father and they are on a personal crusade to change the military world into something which will meet all PC standards, minus any semblance of religious freedom of expression.
He's pure poison, and I'm very surprised he has lasted this long in uniform. No doubt part of it is the fear factor he will sue anybody in sight who he senses "discriminates" against him or his agenda. He has all the free Liberal trial lawyers in the world at his beck and call. Most military people can't afford months in court while they're being sued by Mikey and his ACLU buddies in a civil discrimination lawsuit. They would be financially ruined, and they know it.
He's a pr!ck, First Class, no doubt about it. Unfortunately for the Air Force, there is no "side" for him to accidentally go over in the middle of the night watch. Pity.
The current US policy is that Israel is an ally, both politically and militarily. It is not a formal agreement, like NATO, but that is probably more a function of the intensely complicated and hostile political climate in the Middle East, rather than a reluctance on either side to formalize the agreement. The US also gives Israel monetary aid in the billions of dollars annually, (exact figures hard to calculate).
It seems our biggest disagreement is over on duty/off duty times. The military legally recognizes off duty times, in which service personnel can do many things not permitted while on duty, such as drink alcohol. However, if they are called back to duty, and they are inebriated, they may still be subject to punishment.
There are far fewer travel restriction on active duty, non-combat theater personnel on weekends and holidays, as long as you provide a telephone number where you can be reached.
But being on call, and being on duty, are two very different things.
Why is it bigoted to point out that the jewish 1% of the population is responsible for the majority of the attacks on Christianity? Is it bigoted to say that the majority of world conflicts involve muslims who cannot get along with their neighbors, or that most terrorists are muslim these days?
There is a townhall article written BY A JEWISH MAN on the same subject.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.