Posted on 12/11/2006 11:06:46 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez
I do want the government out of social issues, but the trouble is that the liberal-tarians want to invade my life and that of my family. When I am all too willing to give them the anarchy they ask for, they pee all over themselves and run to the same nanny state for protection...
We're right on the frigging cusp of things here. One one hand I'm afraid I'll be around long enough to have to participate and on the other I'm afraid I won't be but my child will.
Recreational drug use has been chemical warfare waged against the children of this country since the 1960s. The homosexual perverts are waging a psychological and biological war against them and us.
I have seen warfare up close and real personal, it is not always just bombs and bullets...
Or you can be like Ronald Maximus Reagan and be genuine and act on your instincts. Your own real principles if you have any.
they pee all over themselves and run to the same nanny state for protection...
Then they aren't libertarians. They're liberals who don't have the faintest idea of what libertarian principles actually are. Bill Maher is one who particularly irks me for doing that. In a libertarian society Bill Maher would starve to death.
My main objection to the 'drug war' is that I'm tired of being an unwilling babysitter for other peoples kids. I have others, but that's the short version.
I'm mostly a Republican but I have a very wide libertarian streak. I promise to stay out of your families life unless you ask me over for dinner.
I think if we really wanted to end the drug 'problem' the way to do it is legalize it. All of it. Sell whatever those fools want in 5 pound sacks at Safeway to anyone over 21 years of age.
In about 6 months the sane ones among us can police up the bodies and be done with them.
I also promise not to run to anyone for 'protection'. I may have to call on the Gendarmes to document a few things and the medics will most likely have some refuse to haul away but other than that I'll leave Government out of it.
The homosexual perverts are waging a psychological and biological war against them and us.
I really don't give a fig what consenting adults do to each other indoors and out of my sight. Lay one hand on my child and well....lets just say I'll need those Gendarmes and the medics will have another mess.
Let 'em bugger each other out of existence. Just don't come crying to me when you come down with some fatal malady spread by a particular unnatural behavior.
They got themselves into that mess, they can get themselves out. I don't really care one way or the other.
Public health threats should be dealt with as such. We don't allow people to walk around knowingly spreading TB or Typhoid after all.
Just think. Inside of a couple of years most of the idiots will have killed themselves off one way or the other and the rest of us can go about our business in relative peace.
We'll leave the discussion of dealing with the murderous followers of that syphilitic caravan raiding pedophile for another thread.
L
We don't see things a whole lot differently...
I thought not. But then our friend Beyondthesea said he appreciated our brilliance.
It's about damned time someone did.
L
That's about the most preposterous statements I've read on here. Unless you define recent as 12 years.
I call BS on the article.
1. Signed the No Child Left Behind Act, delivering the most dramatic education reforms in a generation (challenging the soft bigotry of low expectations). The very liberal California Teachers union is currently running radio ads against the accountability provisions of this Act.
In my opinion, this is one of Bush's worst mistakes because it yokes the best and brightest students to the worst. Be honest, there are some kids who just can't or won't learn, but this bill guarantees that those failing students will get more tax payer monies thrown at them. And what is called "soft bigotry" is often no more than simply calling a spade a spade. It is pure fallacy to think that spending more money will assure equal outcomes for all children regardless of their innate capabilities.
So true. You nailed it.
Yes; "rigid ideologues" like Jeb Bradley, Charlie Bass, Jim Leach, Mike DeWine, Nancy Johnson, etc.
Of that list, about fifteen should be an relatively easy return to the GOP.
Bird cage liner works for me with the paper on which this crappy and intellectually empty article was written.
Don'rt be astounded. The voters are ignorant......... it's in the plan.
Yes. I was glad to hear Bill Bennett saying good things about Duncan Hunter a few weeks ago on his show. I'm glad to hear Bill isn't entertaining a run for office himself and is instead talking up good men who are.
Between that, the scandals, the media assistance, and the cluelessness of the electorate, the democrats won by a narrow margin.
All of this thinking about whether it was because we were too conservative or too liberal is simply pointless. You can run all conservatives or all liberals. It won't do anything to make the voters smarter or make the media tell the truth.
LOL ...... if only I could get you two to write a book.
I'd drive the bus on the book tour.
I call the article B.S.
LOL! ..... well said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.