Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: daviscupper

not exactly. the port authority's decision would be in conflict with Supreme Court case law. that is the attorney's job to point out.


82 posted on 12/11/2006 8:59:22 AM PST by APRPEH (id theft info available on my profile page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: APRPEH
not exactly. the port authority's decision would be in conflict with Supreme Court case law. that is the attorney's job to point out.

I think the actions were foolish, but you're correct, there's no legal question about the Menorah display.

110 posted on 12/11/2006 9:15:34 AM PST by SJackson (had to move the national debate from whether to stay the course to how do we start down the path out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: APRPEH
You lost me. Are you saying the Port Authority's decision to put up Christmas trees was illegal? Or are you saying the Port Authority's decision to tear down the Christmas trees is illegal?

Personally I do not think the Port Authority did anything illegal. I just think the decision of the rabbi to threaten the Port Authority with a Federal lawsuit was stupid, childish, petty and mean-spirited. I wish the Port Authority had acted differently but the rabbi's actions were outrageous!
119 posted on 12/11/2006 9:20:27 AM PST by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson