To: California Patriot
These Libertarian swine deserve a lot of blame. If we'd had three more Senate seats in the last Congress, things could have been quite different. They blame us for problems that they in part create.That's exactly the attitude I'm talking about - you attack the small "L" libertarian voters and then you get upset when they don't vote for you.
If the GOP wants libertarian votes then they need to embrace smaller, less intrusive government. It's actually pretty simple.
To: JeffAtlanta
Exactly. If we're going to give these voters the boot and tell them we don't want them, we shouldn't be surprised to see the Democrats end up running the country.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." -Manuel II Paleologus
48 posted on
12/10/2006 11:10:27 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: JeffAtlanta
Uh, Jeff, I attacked the big-L Libertarian voters.
And I attacked them because they cost us Senate seats, not for their beliefs.
49 posted on
12/10/2006 11:11:54 PM PST by
California Patriot
("That's not Charlie the Tuna out there. It's Jaws." -- Richard Nixon)
To: JeffAtlanta
If the GOP wants libertarian votes then they need to embrace smaller, less intrusive government. It's actually pretty simple.If libertarians want smaller, less intrusive government then they need to embrace the GOP and get to work within it. It's actually pretty simple.
But I don't believe Libertarians really care about smaller government. If they did they wouldn't be so vain about electing democrats.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson