Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: little jeremiah
All those examples are completely different and you know it.

This is about anti-sodomy laws between consenting adults.

659 posted on 12/11/2006 11:36:51 AM PST by rintense (Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies ]


To: rintense

"This is about anti-sodomy laws between consenting adults."

There are many psychologists and academics - among them the noted "ethicist" Professor Doctor Peter Singer - who advocate that all the examples I mentioned b legally allowed.

They are not different.

Adult incest = consenting adults. Bestiality = an animal can't give consent. Necrophilia = no need for consent. So why shouldn't those be legal? Some people want these types of sexual acts to be legal - they are attracted to these acts and see no reason other than outdated moral bias to be prohibited from them.

Give me one reason why those acts should be illegal.


671 posted on 12/11/2006 12:27:21 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
This is about anti-sodomy laws between consenting adults.

Homosexual sex is still by far the most efficient way to spread HIV. The lifetime treatment cost of an AIDS patient is around $600,000. In case you didn't notice, they don't pay that out of their own pockets. So even with the moral arguments set aside, it's about a great deal more than "consenting adults."
696 posted on 12/11/2006 1:09:45 PM PST by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson