What do you mean by your tagline "Election 2006: For Republicans, the results were comprehensive"?
Are you glad that Republicans lost, "it serves them right" -- and you are joyous that the Dems are now in power?
Sounds like your ego is more important than the fate of the country.
If THIS is what your tagline means, then YOU are personally responsible for the devastation the Dems are already starting to do to the country. Is that what "conservatism" means to you -- put the liberal Dems in power?
THAT is what your tagline implies to me.
If this is not the case, please explain what you mean and you might want to change it, so it doesn't create the wrong impression.
What do you mean by your tagline "Election 2006: For Republicans, the results were comprehensive"?
Are you glad that Republicans lost, "it serves them right" -- and you are joyous that the Dems are now in power?
-
I voted Republican, without any hesitation.
But I really, truly believe Bush's "comprehensive" stance on immigration is the reason Republicans lost.
I cannot understand it. I don't support it. Sometimes I think back to those days when GWB first was being talked about as a candidate, and there was that time when he expressed some hesitation - and there were whispers of something in his past which might be sensitive.
At first, I thought that was the "drunk driving" stink. Recently I've begun to wonder whether there are not people in Mexico who have some sort of leverage over the younger Bush, due to something in his youth, and his partying south of the border.
There is no excuse for selling out our nation, and allowing our borders to be overrun by illegals.
Yet - we find our party run by those, who loudly insist it's good for us.
It. Is. Not. Good. For. Us.
Republicans should never, ever again speak the word "comprehensive".
It's why Democrats won.
Please refer any additional questions to my illegal immigrant assistant. A more comprehensive response will follow.
/s