Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: furquhart

Plus he left Chile a healthy capitalist economy. Neither all saint nor all sinner, Pinochet did handle the communists better than most and Chile is better off from his rule than it would have been from the same time under Allende, who planned to consolidate his marxist hold on the country and then to begin exporting it to the rest of South America. QDEP


35 posted on 12/10/2006 10:07:45 AM PST by 3AngelaD (ic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: 3AngelaD

Right!


37 posted on 12/10/2006 10:10:45 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: 3AngelaD
Plus he left Chile a healthy capitalist economy. Neither all saint nor all sinner, Pinochet did handle the communists better than most and Chile is better off from his rule than it would have been from the same time under Allende, who planned to consolidate his marxist hold on the country and then to begin exporting it to the rest of South America. QDEP

You're falling into the same (il)logical trap that I'm reading elsehwere in this thread. Since Allende was evil, and Pinochet opposed him, then Pinochet must be good. Doesn't work that way. Allende every bit the commie and would-be dictator as portrayed on this thread. That is not in question.

However, just because Pinochet looks better when juxtoposed with Allende, doesn't mean that Pinochet was a good man. The brutal truth is that he MURDERED thousands to achieve his goals. He built a system of gulags modeled on the Soviets and used them ruthlessly against his political enemies. There is nothing about this man which is admirable.

122 posted on 12/10/2006 11:41:24 AM PST by Melas (Offending stupid people since 1963)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson