[Alas Babylon!]

In a way, this is good. I think that many, many folks have indeed seen the ISG as the Iraq Surrender Group, and the media blitz is to try to stem the idea that the study focuses too much on withdrawal and defeat. I also think it won't work, because folks are smart enough to see through the BS and conclude the study is fundementally flawed.

We need to be vigilant today, and several of us need to watch each show and report every instance of DBM/politician lies, distortions, innuendos and omissions.

Who wants sign up for vital but disgusting duty?

[samtheman]

It would be good if there were some counter-point. But there will be no counter-point. I'm going to watch it all, or at least start out watching it all. I might not be able to take it, especially if the "questioners" actually get down on their knees and start "praying" to these two cadavers.

[uncbob]

In a way, this is good. I think that many, many folks have indeed seen the ISG as the Iraq Surrender Group, and the media blitz is to try to stem the idea that the study focuses too much on withdrawal and defeat. I also think it won't work, because folks are smart enough to see through the BS and conclude the study is fundementally flawed.

Well 3 former cabinet level members of GOP administrations --Baker--Meese--Eagleberger--were members of the ISG

Anybody read or hear of DISCENTING opinions from these three

Democrats going to be howling """BIPARTISAN""" for all they are worth
and the MSM media will be doing the same

What an embarrassment

[Rembrandt]

"...because folks are smart enough to see through the BS .."

Those people who are "smart enough" just changed the balance of power in Congress (both houses) from R to D. Just how smart are they? Put me down in the poll as "p" for po'd! As Patton said, paraphrasing, God, how I hate the 21st Century!