To: traderrob6
The only thing that appears to have many on this thread hysterical is the fact that he's Muslim which in my mind is NOT by itself indicative of untrustworthiness or inability to look out for our interests.Still, it does cause some (including me) to be concerned about his ultimate loyalty.
It does a man no service to place him in a position where he has to deny his god to serve his country.
49 posted on
12/09/2006 9:03:55 AM PST by
null and void
(To succeed in life, you need three things: a wishbone, a backbone and a funnybone. --Reba McEntire)
To: null and void
"It does a man no service to place him in a position where he has to deny his god to serve his country."
I see absolutely nothing in his past that would indicate a subjugation of his countries interests to that of his religious beliefs.
To: null and void
Remember, Jesus Christ is the only God out there.../s
57 posted on
12/09/2006 9:08:22 AM PST by
zarf
To: null and void
My review of his background suggests he's a MINO, a thoroughly westernized chap who has been aggressivley and unwaveringly loyal to the United States and to George W. Bush. He's married to an Austrian-American and their two sons are named Alexander and Maximilian (I'd be more concerned if their names were Achmed and Muhammad).
He appears to be a good and safe choice for the UN post.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson