Replies

"Jeez, some people have a lot of trouble with anyone who is different than they are. They cannot grasp the idea that all people have 100% value. And so if they are men - they believe they are *better than* women because women are different than them and they don't know how to deal with that. And they think that those of a different color than they are are *lesser than* because they don't know how to deal with difference. Same with homosexuals. Homosexuals are different and therefore - they want to destroy them or shame them or call them all kinds of names and blame them for problems that they have nothing to do with."

As usual, SS, you are promoting leftist sexual ethics and immorality, as so many others are on this and other like threads.

You're comparing homosexuality with race, again, which is not only comparing apples and, say, cotter pins, but is demeaning and insulting to people of "other" races (everyone is a member of "another" race!). I have several bi-racial couples as friends, and every one of them is disgusted by being compared to homosexuals.

Race is a benign characteristic that is immutable. Homosexuality is (a) not inborn, (b) mutable and (c) far from benign.

Your adolescent spewing of 60s rhetoric is merely an "amen" chorus to all the other pro-homosexualists on Fr. It has to truth, no facts, and is based on nothing but pure sentiment.

Here's the elephant in the living room:

Homosexuality is either perfectly fine, normal, natural, healthy, and anyone who protests it being culturally equated with normal sexual relationships is a sick, hateful bigot with emotional problems and likely attracted to homosexuality themselves.

OR

Homosexuality is an emotional sickness, unnatural, immoral and unhealthy, and should be discouraged, not promoted, and those suffering from it should be offered treatment, not support in their behavior.

Which is true? Everyone needs to pick a side.

And if anyone wants to choose the first side, the burden is on you to prove that same sex behavior is natural, healthy and poses no moral risks to those who practice it and those around them (such as adolescents). I and many others have over the years posted numerous studies and articles replete with overwhelming evidence - much of it compiled by homosexuals and homosexual promoting groups - that incontestably proves the second point.

Let's see your studies proving that homosexuals are just as monogamous as normal people, do not molest children or adolescents in any larger numbers, are not more prone to drug or alcohol addiction, domestic violence, suicide, or life threatening diseases. Show us your facts, emtionally driven platitudes and personal attacks and name calling mean squat.

Here's the elephant in the living room:
Homosexuality is either perfectly fine, normal, natural, healthy, and anyone who protests it being culturally equated with normal sexual relationships is a sick, hateful bigot with emotional problems and likely attracted to homosexuality themselves.
OR
Homosexuality is an emotional sickness, unnatural, immoral and unhealthy, and should be discouraged, not promoted, and those suffering from it should be offered treatment, not support in their behavior.
Which is true? Everyone needs to pick a side.
And if anyone wants to choose the first side, the burden is on you to prove that same sex behavior is natural, healthy and poses no moral risks to those who practice it and those around them (such as adolescents). I and many others have over the years posted numerous studies and articles replete with overwhelming evidence - much of it compiled by homosexuals and homosexual promoting groups - that incontestably proves the second point.

Let's see your studies proving that homosexuals are just as monogamous as normal people, do not molest children or adolescents in any larger numbers, are not more prone to drug or alcohol addiction, domestic violence, suicide, or life threatening diseases. Show us your facts, emtionally driven platitudes and personal attacks and name calling mean squat.

You, too, just nailed it!