Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Central Scrutiniser

The comparision is rather lame, and rather proves the opposite of your point, which is Haggard and Foley are both homos who betrayed their respective organisations which rather enforces the views that these organisations should weed out gays/lesbians from their ranks.

I have not made any nonsensical attacks on Gay couples, but rather just pointing that Republicans should stop being so inclusive of homosexual issues and take a more traditional stand on it which is reinforced by the big margins in which gay marriage has been banned in most parts of America by voters in referendums.


206 posted on 12/08/2006 10:37:53 PM PST by GregH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: GregH
I have not made any nonsensical attacks on Gay couples, but rather just pointing that Republicans should stop being so inclusive of homosexual issues and take a more traditional stand on it which is reinforced by the big margins in which gay marriage has been banned in most parts of America by voters in referendums.

If wishes were horses...

When the GOP controlled both houses of Congress and the Presidency - nothing was done on changing the Constitution to ban gay marriage. Republicans and the Republican party are not going to ban gays or retreat into the past on what you call traditional issues. The GOP will continue to be about personal freedom and personal responsibility.

223 posted on 12/08/2006 10:43:52 PM PST by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson