Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: seekthetruth
"also hope he says he will give more consideration to what he hears from the troops on the ground than what he hears from those who have not been to Iraq"

Bush should do that. But if Bush can't get Iraq to stand up before 2008 and reploy these troops elsewhere, then kiss goodbye to all who support him in Congress. The troops know that it did not take 4 years to train them to fight.

46 posted on 12/08/2006 5:25:27 PM PST by ex-snook ("But above all things, truth beareth away the victory.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: ex-snook

exactly right. I keep trying to post that side of the argument.

look, all of us here want to win. we all want things to work out well. But we have closed off alot of options for ourselves - we gave iraq this democracy, so we can't use acute US military force and kick butt all over the country, without Malaki's approval. And Sadr owns Maliki, even Rush admitted that on his show today. so that limits this option. next, we know syria and iran are acting to de-stabilize iraq. anyone here seriously think we are going to attack syria or iran?

so basically, we are down to the same plan we've always had for this phase 2 of the war - the iraqis must stand up. OK, it a good plan. What if it doesn't happen? What happens if iraq is unable to pull themselves together, suppose the internal strife, the religious differences, and problems too big for them to overcome. What happens then?


48 posted on 12/08/2006 5:31:59 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson