Posted on 12/08/2006 4:02:15 PM PST by IntelliQuark
You don't have to. He's not doing what you accuse him of doing.
As for the 'nasty.' Your vulgar language in your first post belies your present attempt at civility.
I'll leave you to do your own research.
When the truth comes out, they run and hide.
They're brave'ns they are......
Frankly, even another attack will not dissuade the lefty Dems from cutting and running. They hate the military, remember unless it plays social justice and handing out goodies roles. If and when they try to cut the military budget, once again, will the public stand up and say NO? My guess is No they will not . Can Obama or Hillary be far behind as our next failed leadership??
Come up with a plan, Harry, and perhaps we can have a meaningful debate about what to do in Iraq.
I'm sorry we are not having an actual discussion about this matter because it is far more important and complicated than has been addressed on this thread. At some point, the political pain and human loss will require a serious explanation.
I told you to educate yourself because he hadn't appointed them.
You then said that if he didn't control everything done like Clinton did, he was naive.
I don't think there's a whole lot more to discuss on this subject.
I'm not quite sure what your cryptic comment about pain and 'human loss' was about, but I don't think I like what you are implying here, so it cements even further the need for me to leave the conversation.
Ohio, Let's just chalk this one up to misunderstanding and part as friends. Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy Hannukah!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.