Skip to comments.
Bush Reaction to Report Worries Father's Aides
US News & World Report ^
| December 8 2006
| Kenneth T. Walsh
Posted on 12/08/2006 10:27:04 AM PST by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
1
posted on
12/08/2006 10:27:09 AM PST
by
jmc1969
To: jmc1969
What an @$$hole and a coward! Sure, just throw the President under the bus, and support the Surrender Monkeys, anonymously!
To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusionsAnd W is the dumb one, right? Most of the groups conclusions are dumb and utter garbage. W is right to be dismissive.
3
posted on
12/08/2006 10:29:56 AM PST
by
frogjerk
(REUTERS: We give smoke and mirrors a bad name)
To: jmc1969
If these clowns are keenly disappointed, then I'm keenly satisfied.
To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusionsGood
5
posted on
12/08/2006 10:30:16 AM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: jmc1969
Former White House advisers to George H.W. Bush are keenly disappointed and concerned about the current President Bush's initial reaction to the report by the Iraq Study Group.So sad, too bad...
To: jmc1969
He should have used it to clean up after Barney..........
7
posted on
12/08/2006 10:30:48 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(New! HeadOn Hemorrhoid Medication for Liberals!.........Apply directly to forehead.........)
To: jmc1969
"They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions..."Maybe because he knows they are junk.
8
posted on
12/08/2006 10:31:01 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: Victoria Delsoul
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions, issued yesterday, Best news I have read in a few days! ;-)
9
posted on
12/08/2006 10:31:17 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
(Rock, Rock, Rock and Rollergames! Rockin' & Rolling, Rockin' with Rollergames!)
To: jmc1969
Oh, Really?
Well, I'LL be disappointed if he follows their suggestion of talking to the Iranians and Syrians.
10
posted on
12/08/2006 10:32:28 AM PST
by
nuconvert
([there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business] (...but his head is so tiny...))
To: Red Badger
Theres even enough of it for Mrs. Beasley and the kitty!
11
posted on
12/08/2006 10:32:43 AM PST
by
dforest
To: jmc1969
W is one of the few that see the dark clouds on the horizon.
12
posted on
12/08/2006 10:32:46 AM PST
by
kinghorse
(calls them like I sees them)
To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusionsAnd the problem with this is ???
13
posted on
12/08/2006 10:33:28 AM PST
by
pbear8
(RIP James Kim)
To: jmc1969
How the hell did we survive 88-92 with so many of these clowns in charge?
My take is that Papa Buss invalidated some of the REALLY REALLY bad policies.
He was POTUS after all.
14
posted on
12/08/2006 10:33:48 AM PST
by
Killborn
(Age of servitude. A government of the traitors, by the liars, for the sheep.)
To: frogjerk
The Study Group's recommendations for Iraq seem virtually identical to the policies that got us into trouble in Viet Nam as early as the Kennedy regime.
More worrisome, though, is the attitude implicit in the report that the "Missouri Compromise" will continue to work to keep America safe ~
15
posted on
12/08/2006 10:35:05 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: frogjerk
History will show that W was the last president that had a pair.
16
posted on
12/08/2006 10:35:31 AM PST
by
todd1
To: kinghorse
W is one of the few that see the dark clouds on the horizon. And most of Poppy's greedy old cowardly Saudi lackeys are in their twilight years and probably don't care much about what things will be like 10-20 years down the road.
They have little or nothing to offer in the way of worthwhile advice for how we're going to deal with this problem. They did a lot to contribute to the problem in the first place.
17
posted on
12/08/2006 10:37:46 AM PST
by
jpl
To: jmc1969
GHWB, crawl back into the shadow of your son, who, hopefully, will NOT be distracted by James Baker, Globalist lawyer to the Saudi Dubais, and Lee Hamilton, a pompous self-important nincompoop.
To: jmc1969
They consider him rather dismissive of the group's conclusions As well he should be, considering many of those conclusions would've made even Neville Chamberlain blush.
19
posted on
12/08/2006 10:38:11 AM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: jmc1969
This isn't "circling the wagons". It is politely ignoring the ravings of a pack of lunatics. You don't even have to go past the executive summary of the report to see that the the ten wise guys had to be drunk when they wrote it.
20
posted on
12/08/2006 10:38:22 AM PST
by
Busywhiskers
(Strength and honor.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson