Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Cree
What I've done is to insure for far less than the replacement value of the home, and get the highest deductible possible. In my view, the house is not likely to be totaled anyway, althought that does happen.

Yep. Similar to healthcare, the model will need to change in order to protect people from catastrophic losses while allowing them to self insure up to a level they can afford. The system already allows this (provided you have equity in your home), and smart people in high risk areas will begin to take advantage of it.

276 posted on 12/10/2006 6:18:07 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies ]


To: NittanyLion

I've long wished I could buy a healthcare policy that was primarily directed at catostrophic type expense - my feeling is that, expensive as meds are, I'd probably spend less on them than on insurance.

But my belief is that health insurance would likely be cheaper if government would restrain itself from distorting the market.

Milton Friedman has a nice essay on healthcare and insurance that is widely available on the net.

My wife has a pre existing condition that no insurer wants to touch, just about impossible to buy insurance for her. I still don't think it's the state's place to be selling insurance, not being a believer in socialized medicine.


277 posted on 12/10/2006 6:33:14 AM PST by Sam Cree (don't mix alcopops and ufo's - absolute reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson