Posted on 12/06/2006 2:39:59 PM PST by Tarkus2040
I'm thinking that...
4/5 medical doctors agree, Weiner worship and ignorance or not mutually exclusive.
My first taste of the JBS people was during Reagan, and they hated him with a passion.
Maybe tarkus can help you out on this, because I think tark heard him say that as well. I have heard him several times.
Perhaps Weiner is better off replaying tapes of Bush 41' crying rather than rehash his support for a socialist wage cap scheme?
Ok, so the story of Weiner having a gay affair with Alan Ginsburg is an equally valid conclusion to make?
Many Freepers have been warned about propagating rumors, such as the one you are forwarding.
Still, no medical records, but rather ignorance.
Where did you get your medical degree and do your residency? .......I thought so. If we are going to base our medical diagnoses on folklore and wives tales can we conclude your idiocy is the result of chronic masturbation?
Damn fine logic so early in the morning.
We have another winner here!
Propagating a rumour to counter one is uncool.(and lousy arguing)
Even if you did it on purpose.(you wouldn't do that , would you?)
That word is not allowed.
If one can be warned for propagating rumors about Weiner, than why is it ok for a Weiner fan to propagate rumors about Rush?
Logic would dictate that such Weiner fans would be warned by the moderator to stay off the thread for good as well.
"Guess WHAT??? Baker - Botts even has offices in RIYADH!!!"
Yes, Baker, and all of the other Washington fat-cat elites both Democrats and Republican have and will continue to prosper by taking advantage of big business opportunities created by the war in Iraq. They could care less about the personal sacrifices and dedication of our military men and women.
It is so sad that the cut and run crowd is prevailing and the deaths of our proud warriors will be considered by the media as meaningless just as the media has done with the Vietnam War 58,000 military dead.
A combat soldier's view of war is not about politics but is about his buddies and their survival.
Although the media will try to diminish their deaths those brave soldiers and Marines WILL be remembered!
That's a lie. There are some very reasonable "male infidels" on this thread. At least I think they are male.
Mary Cheney's pregnancy affects us all
By Janice Shaw Crouse
Thursday, December 7, 2006
Mary Cheney’s pregnancy poses problems not just for her child, but also for all Americans. Her action repudiates traditional values and sets an appalling example for young people at a time when father absence is the most pressing social problem facing the nation. With 37 percent of American children born to fatherless families, Mary Cheney is contributing to a trend that is detrimental to all Americans who will live with the ramifications of millions of children whose anger and frustration at not knowing their father will be felt in the public schools and communities of our nation.
Mary Cheney is among that burgeoning group of adult women over age 20 that are driving the trend of women who don’t want a man in the picture, but want to have a baby. These older women are pushing out-of-wedlock birth statistics higher and higher. At a time when teen births and teen abortions are declining dramatically, older women are having more un-wed births and more abortions, including repeat abortions (indicating that they are using abortion as birth control).
Well-educated, professional Mary Cheney is flying in the face of the accumulated wisdom of the top experts who agree that the very best family structure for a child’s well-being is a married mom and dad family. Her child will have all the material advantages it will need, but it will still encounter the emotional devastation common to children without fathers.
One Georgia high school principal reported, “We have too many young men and women from single-mother families that don’t have the role models at home to teach them how to deal with adversity and handle responsibility. They’ve seen their mom work 60 hours a week just to put food on the table; they end up fending for themselves.”
When fatherless children get to be teens, the girls tend to start looking for love in all the wrong places and the boys tend to find as their role model the bad-boy celebrities of MTV, NFL and NBA.
As they grow older, fatherless children tend to have trouble dealing with male authority figures. Too often children in single-mother households end up angry at their absent fathers and resentful of the mother who has had to be a father figure, too. Typically, the boys who have a love-hate relationship with their mother end up hating all women. Numerous of them look for vulnerable women where they can act out their anger and be in control.
Mary Cheney’s action sets an example that is detrimental for mothers with less financial resources who will start down an irrevocable path into poverty that tends to be generational –– children in households without a father tend to themselves have unwed births later in life. Experts from both the left and the right cite a disastrous litany of negative outcomes that are predictable when a child grows up in a fatherless family. Such children tend to get involved in drugs, alcohol abuse, and delinquency; they tend to drop out of school and have teen pregnancies. An assistant principal in a Junior High School said that many of the behavioral problems that teachers face in the classroom stem from households without a father’s influence.
Mary’s pregnancy is an “in-your-face” action countering the Bush Administration’s pro-family, pro-marriage and pro-life policies. She continues to repudiate the work to which her father has devoted his life. Mary has repeatedly said that “studies” show that children only need a loving home. Her statement is incomplete because the experts agree that for the well-being of children, they desperately need a married father and a mother.
All those people who talk about doing what is best “for our children” need to get back to the basics: children need a married mom and dad. Children can do without a lot of the trimmings of childhood, but nothing can replace a home where the mother and dad love each other enough to commit for a lifetime and are absolutely crazy about their kids –– enough to be willing to sacrifice their own needs to see that their children get the very best.
Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Senior Fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, the think tank for Concerned Women for America, is a recognized authority on domestic issues, the United Nations, cultural and women’s concerns.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JaniceShawCrouse/2006/12/07/mary_cheneys_pregnancy_affects_us_all
I didn't take anything "out of context."
My post was expressly to you, and no other.
i.e. What YOU said.
Simple: no?
Ok, so it was ok for Bill Frist to view a videotape of Terry Schiavo's and conclude she was not in a vegetative state, but it is not allowed for me to surmise Rush drugged himself deaf despite his admitted Oxycontin abuse and the common side effect of loss of hearing of his level of abuse. You have no cogent arguments and so must try and censor my opinions with an absurd medical litmus test. How pathetic.
Ok, so it was ok for Bill Frist to view a videotape of Terry Schiavo's and conclude she was not in a vegetative state, but it is not allowed for me to surmise Rush drugged himself deaf despite his admitted Oxycontin abuse and the common side effect of loss of hearing of his level of abuse. You have no cogent arguments and so must try and censor my opinions with an absurd medical litmus test. How pathetic.
Are you asserting that it is "folklore" that Rush Limbaugh abused Oxycontin? Are those cochlear implants on his DittoCam or am I hallucinating? Do facts mean anything to you at all, or do you just discard them when they are inconvenient to your attempted argument?
211 removed.
What happened?
Something fishy going on with posts being removed.
I think I know what's happening.
Re: I KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENING.
Not impressed.
I've been perusing the web for articles about the flying Imams, and came across an extremely well-written one by a man named Bob Parks:
The Islamic Empire Strikes Back
http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/12/05/the-islamic-empire-strikes-back/
So isn’t this special. Muslims now know they can go to any airport, scare the shit out of the flying public and flight crews, and can get a congressional investigation out of it. Everyone, who was minding their own business that day, will now have their lives turned upside down because of some creeps with an agenda. As I said before, some Muslims have no intention of assimilating into the culture they chose to enter. They want us all either Muslim or dead. We can choose.
And by the way, Congressman-elect Keith Ellison of Minnesota, who is supporting the flying Imams, and is also the first Muslim elected to Congress, will take the oath of office next month, not with his hand on a Bible, but a Quran. Ellison vowed to criminalize Muslim profiling, at a fundraiser for CAIR, and condemned US Airways for “prejudice and ignorance.” I blew away a CAIR representative a few years ago on Los Angeles radio because she called me a racist for supporting racial profiling post 9/11. She thought I was white when she called me a racist.
CAIR now has Ellison to block for them.
Who is blocking for us?
I like the cut of this guy's jib! Speaking of this Ellison character, the first elected Muslim Congresscritter, should immediately be investigated by the FBI, if he isn't already. Like the CAIR vermin, I'm sure this guy has ties to Islamo-terrorists here, and abroad.
Bush Sr. came to tears over feeling "proud" of Jeb. Exactly what he has done to garner such praise from his father over his political career, I have no idea. No matter whom our next President might be, I hope he (or she - God forbid!) isn't so cozy with Mexico.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.