Replies

Things look very bad.

No kidding and you going around spouting off things that are not factually is not helping matters

186 posted on 12/06/2006 3:27:55 PM PST by Mo1 (Thank You Mr & Mrs "I'm gonna teach you a lesson" Voter ... you just screwed us on so many levels)

So which part of this incorrect?

1. That until three weeks ago, after the bulk of this report was written and agreed to, Secretary Gates sat on this commission.

2. This commission's report calls for (1) the abandonment of Iraq by the first quarter of 2008 and (2) the abandonment of Israel.

3. Supporters of Israel, including John Bolton and Don Rumsfeld, are being purged from the Administration.

4. Hawks and supporters of Israel are being replaced by the likes of Gates.

Help me out here. Where exactly have I gone wrong? What makes you believe, if you do, that Gates opposes the ISG's report?

191 posted on 12/06/2006 3:32:31 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)

Additionally, what makes you think, if you do, that Bush is going to oppose the ISG's recomendations?

192 posted on 12/06/2006 3:34:24 PM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794