Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tiredoflaundry
I understand the Pentagon is also making a report. It will be very interesting to compare the two.

Eh. A report is a report - doesn't matter where it comes from, there will be enough CYA in it to ensure that some liberal will be pleased as punch.

In the interest of sanity, I offer the following report: On March 20th, United States and Coalition forces entered into Iraq with the set goal of removing any resistance by the Iraqi government. On April 9th, Baghdad fell into coalition hands, and it was accepted by the international community that the nation of Iraq, as it stood prior to March 20th, no longer existed as a viable political entity.

Casualties were light, most were deemed accidents, and indeed, the accident ratio is in line with most large scale training exercises. Actual fatalities inflicted by foreign forces were minimal. In all aspects, attention was made to minimize long term infrastructure damage, as well as an eye to maintaining health and human services. The shocking fall of any and all forms of government once Saddam lost control was unexpected, and no credible person could be brought forward to 'surrender' Iraq to the coalition forces.

Search and destroy missions were carried out during and after the invasion, finding a hundred thousand tons of munitions and supplies that were not declared by Iraq as required as a condition of the cessation of hostilities from nearly 12 years before. Mass graves were found, detailed records of a regime that was brutal and sadistic, as well as financial records exposing an international web of deceit and evasion.

There ya go. Iraq in a nutshell. Anything after April 9th that was not directly related to investigating crimes committed by the nation of Iraq is just sideshow stuff. I do not belittle the service of our troops, they are there offering assistance to what has become at least a tentative ally. But the war in Iraq ended for all intents and purposes on the 20th day. One can not have a war against a nation that stopped existing.

323 posted on 12/06/2006 8:41:02 AM PST by kingu (No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: kingu

But MOABITES and NUKEM types can't get that fact through their thick skulls.


433 posted on 12/06/2006 8:54:00 AM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

To: kingu

Thanks very much for your excellent summary. The objective of the Iraq War was to replace Saddam's regime, and that has happened, so... we won.

All these reports, haggling, etc. are just exercises in politically-motivated goalpost-shifting. Largely irrelevent.

Next significant event is when Saddam hangs.

Thanks again.



485 posted on 12/06/2006 9:02:09 AM PST by Whit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson