Skip to comments.
Mary Cheney and Partner Are About to Be Moms
Washington Post ^
| December 6, 2006
| Amy Argetsinger and Roxanne Roberts
Posted on 12/05/2006 11:04:34 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 561-571 next last
To: Sunsong
I hope people here can muster some common decency and show a little of the dignity and class the Cheney family demonstrates.
REPLY: I see no dignity in violating the principals set out in the bible on how to procreate a child.
I feel sorry for the Cheney family but Mary is their burden and is not for us to carry.
I believe that God may have a different take on artificially manufacturing a child.
You plea reeks of more feminazi emasculation of the already weak American male.
21
posted on
12/05/2006 11:40:17 PM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
To: peggybac
Perhaps Rummy is the proud Pappy and the Presidential Election for 2048 will begin the day the baby is born,
Donald Dick Rumsfeld-Cheney for President 2048!
Run, Liberals, Run!!
22
posted on
12/05/2006 11:41:34 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
To: El Gato
Not to defend the practice, I think kids, especially boys, need fathers, not two mothers El Gato...this ain't agin' you...but men have not been stepping up to the plate.
...and if people say men have been beaten down by feminism...then they're not real men.
A high percentage of boys are raised by single moms these days, and most turn out okay...not ideal...but okay. The men are not there.
Two loving parents, in this case, have a trump on the single mom with serial boyfriends.
All that said...I agree with you...a mom AND a DAD are the best option.
23
posted on
12/05/2006 11:43:27 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: trumandogz
"Perhaps Rummy is the proud Pappy..."
As long as it's not Dick Cheney....
24
posted on
12/05/2006 11:43:56 PM PST
by
decal
(We're all in the same boat - start bailing!)
To: decal
No human needs a Double Dose of those Dick Cheney genes.
25
posted on
12/05/2006 11:45:39 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
What happened to the United States of America that I grew up in?
COMMENT:
It went the way of the Edsel and Hoola Hoop.
To many men lost sight of their Godly duties as masters of the house.
To many old sixties hippies survived to tear down America with the help of their comrades in arms such as Traitor John Kerry.
Hell, all us men have left to do to morph into real sissy's is to get in touch with are inner feelings and have a good cry with the gals.
26
posted on
12/05/2006 11:46:54 PM PST
by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia now a certified socialist state reporting to Mexico City for further instructions)
To: snugs
You're going to want to see this first thing in the AM.
27
posted on
12/05/2006 11:49:22 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: OKIEDOC
I believe that God may have a different take on artificially manufacturing a child. My brother has two beautiful girls through in-vitro.
They took the totally moral stance of accepting however many eggs were fertilized.
There was nothing wrong in the birth of my two nieces.
28
posted on
12/05/2006 11:52:08 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: A6M3
29
posted on
12/05/2006 11:53:58 PM PST
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: decal
To save America for the long run we may need to open a "GOP Stud Farm."
Of course no Rino's could be introduced but we could find a great breading stock starting with Ann Coulter and Michele Malkin.
On the other side of the fence we could start with Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Rummy, Bush and Cheney.
30
posted on
12/05/2006 11:54:27 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
To: trumandogz
we could find a great breading stock starting with Ann Coulter and Michele Malkin Ask them about how they'd feel about being your heifers.
31
posted on
12/05/2006 11:58:49 PM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: trumandogz
Of course no Rino's could be introduced but we could find a great breading stock starting with Ann Coulter and Michele Malkin. Have you ever hear of "eugenics?" Margaret Sanger...read about it. Hope you or none of yours had a Democrat mother.
32
posted on
12/06/2006 12:02:27 AM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: paulat
The concept is to breed the best conservative female minds in our country with with the best conservative male minds. The kids are then provided with a solid conservative education on military tactics, economics and social issues.
Once educated they will be elected to the Presidency and perhaps the Senate.
What Could Go Wrong??????
33
posted on
12/06/2006 12:03:44 AM PST
by
trumandogz
(Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
To: paulat
My kids have a democratic mother.
34
posted on
12/06/2006 12:04:59 AM PST
by
trumandogz
(Rudy G 2008: The "G" Stands For Gun Grabbing & Gay Lovin.)
To: trumandogz
What Could Go Wrong?????? With all due respect...you're terribly annoying.
35
posted on
12/06/2006 12:05:13 AM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: West Coast Conservative
Personally, I don't think this is any of our business.
But I find it fascinating that many (not all) anti-gay-parent folks here on FR are willing to give Mary Cheney a pass simply because she's the daughter of a favored Republican.
If this were the gay daughter of Democrats they'd want to string her up and/or throw her out of the country, and/or say it was all the fault of her Democrat parents. Where is the condemnation they heap on the opposition? Why is this not Dick and Lynne Cheney's "faults" for how they raised their daughter? I sense some uneasy hypocrisy.
Understand, my own opinion is:
- A married man and woman are the best combination for parents raising children.
- Mary's situation is none of our business.
- It's also not a matter for the media to gawk at or gossip about.
- Dick and Lynne are not "at fault" for their daughter's homosexuality, nor for her becoming a gay parent. It's Mary's life and her decisions. Same would be true if they were all Democrats.
- It's a shame the biological father won't have the benefits and responsibilities of fatherhood of this baby.
- Any meaningful condemnation or blessing should, and will, come from their God, not from us.
We ought to just wish them well and be comforted in the knowledge that their new family addition will be happy and loved. And leave them all alone.
36
posted on
12/06/2006 12:06:05 AM PST
by
dayglored
(Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
To: SoCalPol
We're not discussing economics. We're talking about rational people like Ms. Cheney who are not capable of having a family because of her sexual and relationship choice. She took a baby from a potential mom and dad. bottomline.
37
posted on
12/06/2006 12:06:41 AM PST
by
ridge
To: trumandogz
My kids have a democratic mother. Well, then...you answered your own question.
38
posted on
12/06/2006 12:07:18 AM PST
by
paulat
(about)
To: OKIEDOC
I believe that God may have a different take on artificially manufacturing a child. It's no skin off God's back, but it doesn't do much for the human race.
39
posted on
12/06/2006 12:08:05 AM PST
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: ridge
Some mom & dad's should not be parents.
Working with the county attys. I have seen what some have done to their kids, most is not printable.
40
posted on
12/06/2006 12:11:54 AM PST
by
SoCalPol
(We Need A Border Fence Now)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 561-571 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson