Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas
His previous answer, he said, pertains “to Iraq as a whole,” not to the performance of U.S. forces there. “I didn’t want my comments to be interpreted as suggesting that they weren’t being successful in their endeavors,” he said.

You realize this is simply a very nice way of saying, "We're winning all the battles. Just not the war."

We're losing in Iraq, but not because the military is unsuccessful. How reassuring.

145 posted on 12/05/2006 12:11:30 PM PST by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Steel Wolf

The academic has a lot to learn, I am afraid it is not time for someone to learn, it is a time of war, a time to act and lead, a time to fight and win. Still the President has the final say and he is the only Commander in Chief, however the President has enough problems on his hands and he does not need to correct his secretary of defense when the latter issue a defeatist statement as he did earlier today in the hearings.


150 posted on 12/05/2006 12:19:21 PM PST by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: Steel Wolf

Same as in Vietnam, the only way we can lose in Iraq, is if we (or the media) will convince ourselves that we did.


153 posted on 12/05/2006 12:25:56 PM PST by CutePuppy (If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson