Skip to comments.
Defense Secretary Nominee Gates is a Defeatist
December 5th 2006
| jveritas
Posted on 12/05/2006 10:10:32 AM PST by jveritas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-186 last
To: meema
We aimed to (1) neutralize Saddam and (2) establish a central government friendly to us.
181
posted on
12/05/2006 6:37:07 PM PST
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Jim 0216
Resources and winning strategies would follow. Sure thing. $300 Billion, another 400,000 active duty troops, and more Pentagon spending will fix everything now.
To: trumandogz
President bush would have never lead us into a war which we could not win. Therefore, we will not lose this war.Interesting how that is exactly what the Japanese were saying about their emperor in 1944!
183
posted on
12/05/2006 7:10:03 PM PST
by
meandog
(These are the times that try men's souls!)
To: Alter Kaker
If we leave Iraq too soon, we'll be back there the third time to complete "unfinished business".
184
posted on
12/06/2006 12:43:20 AM PST
by
MinorityRepublican
(Everyone that doesn't like what America and President Bush has done for Iraq can all go to HELL)
To: ARealMothersSonForever
$300 Billion, another 400,000 active duty troops, and more Pentagon spending will fix everything now. No, that's an extension of the same Substitute-for-Winning Plan they already have.
185
posted on
12/06/2006 3:16:01 PM PST
by
Jim W N
To: Jim 0216
My sarcasm tag fell off. I think it wound up on the bottom of the page ;)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-186 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson