To: woodbutcher
Besides, we who do have a lot of time are not impressed.<<<
Perhaps you speak of your "time" and acquaintences only to impress people, but the conversation here derived from the subject at hand and was not designed to impress anyone, but rather to share relief we've all experienced at a partially good ending to what could have been tragic.
You don't know the "time" or backgrounds of any of us, do you, not that it even pertains to the conversation. One can always tell a self-important person by the nature of their assumptions, and you and grandiosity appear to be well acquainted.
208 posted on
12/04/2006 6:09:35 PM PST by
Mjaye
To: Mjaye
What does your aviation experience have to do with the survival of the Kims. They were driving not flying.
211 posted on
12/04/2006 6:13:55 PM PST by
tubebender
(Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
To: Mjaye
You don't know the "time" or backgrounds of any of us, do you, not that it even pertains to the conversation. One can always tell a self-important person by the nature of their assumptions, and you and grandiosity appear to be well acquainted.
I have picked up some good pointer from this thread. I would rather stick to that.
But in response to your comment, had I wanted to impress anyone with my time, I would have done so about the third or so post.
Not under the name woodbutcher, but another, I have been on the internet since the days when Compu-serve was about the only thing unless you were a real techie and nowhere on the net will you find a hanger flying story from/about/by me.
Besides, almost all hanger flying stories have their roots in poor preflight planning. I always felt that a good reason not to be the star of the hanger flying sessions.
So much for my trying to impress.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson