Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kiriath_jearim
This sucks. While pot isn't something I want my kids to use (FYI I have no kids). You don't see people go nuts and start robbing people to get their fix. This is a travesty. A murderer gets a lesser penalty?

I'm not exactly for legalizing drugs but to me, pot compares to alcohol and cigarettes.
2 posted on 12/04/2006 2:28:27 PM PST by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lx
A murderer gets a lesser penalty?

Then the solution is to increase the sentence for murderers, not reduce sentences for armed drug dealers

4 posted on 12/04/2006 2:31:19 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lx
"A murderer gets a lesser penalty?"

That's not right.....the only thing wrong here is that murderers' sentences are always TOO lenient....

23 posted on 12/04/2006 2:47:14 PM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lx

The question is who gets to decide minimum sentences in this country. Our legislatures or our judges?

We'd better leave it to the legislatures. They may not always get it right, but I bet they do as well as the judges would.


37 posted on 12/04/2006 2:58:28 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lx
"You don't see people go nuts and start robbing people to get their fix. This is a travesty."

Oh yes you do. Not only that, but pot supports the Taliban, and other Islamic terrorists who shoot at our troops with bullets paid for with the money they make off this stuff.

So, if you think smoking pot is harmless, think again. This guy was a pot dealer, who also had firearms offences and was involved in money laundering. He wasn't just a "harmless" pot smoker.

52 posted on 12/04/2006 3:21:23 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lx
I'm not exactly for legalizing drugs but to me, pot compares to alcohol and cigarettes.

The penalty seems to be not for the drugs, but for the gun while selling drugs.

68 posted on 12/04/2006 3:46:27 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lx

I think the same argument applies that I use in response to death penalty opponents-- these harsh sentences are pretty easy to avoid: don't commit the crime. I don't really care, as a substantive matter, how much pot people own, sell or smoke, as long as I don't have to bear the costs of that use. But before you make the CHOICE to buy, sell or use a substance known to be illegal, you are obligated to check the consequences of getting caught with the contraband and while possessing a firearm. Harsh penalty? Yes. Avoidable? Yes.


80 posted on 12/04/2006 3:56:47 PM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Lx
Remember how we got to this point? Mandatory sentence legislation was enacted because liberal judges took a dislike to punishing felons and were pushing them through a hand-slap turnstile back into society.

Perhaps legislatures have overreacted and will revisit the issue. Just as soon as they do, you can bet liberal judges will return to dumping felons unpunished back into society.

82 posted on 12/04/2006 3:59:40 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson