Replies

"I don't know; they pulled in an impressive 0.1% of the popular vote in 2004."

The same people who write this are usually the same people who blame these "half-percenters," "Buchananites," "paleo-cons," and "Constipation turd party voters" on the GOP loss in 2006. You can't have it both ways. Either the paleo-conservatives make up more than 0.5% of the U.S. population or they did not cost the GOP the 2006 midterms. Pick one lie and stick with it.

The same people who write this are usually the same people who blame these "half-percenters," "Buchananites," "paleo-cons," and "Constipation turd party voters" on the GOP loss in 2006.

If you can point to a single post of mine anywhere in this forum wherein I have made such a comment you would have a point. If not you're blowing hot air, which is what your type usually do.

You can't have it both ways.

I don't recall saying I could.

Either the paleo-conservatives make up more than 0.5% of the U.S. population or they did not cost the GOP the 2006 midterms.

Such mindless rhetoric; so typical of you Ronald Reagan or nothing types. Guess what, Sparky. The perfect conservative candidate won't be running. If you think so name him/her and predict what chance he has of winning.

Pick one lie and stick with it.

Either point out wherein I have lied or be proven a liar yourself.

Thanks for proving me right, again.