Well, to me it looks like you learned the lesson.:) Too bad it had to come at the expense of us putting up with him.
I just can't help but laugh when I think of the possibilities if 2000 were a reverse '92 (Bush winning with 43% of the vote with a strong Nader candidacy). DUmmies would be even more batshit crazy than they already were after 2000.
Those were different times. People were genuinly angry about Bush 41 breaking the no new taxes pledge and we were not at war at the time, Perot really struck a nerve with the public. I don't ever remember any time that I voted when so many people came out to vote as that year. One thing it showed any candidate is the American people are pretty patient, except when someone lies to us.