[taxesareforever]

In his interview, Breyer argued that in some cases it wouldn't make sense to strictly follow the Constitution because phrases such as "freedom of speech" are vague. Judges must look at the real-world context — not focus solely on framers' intent, as Scalia has argued — because society is constantly evolving, he said.

If it's not his job to follow the Constitution then it's time for him to find another job.

[wagglebee]

As Justice Scalia and others have correctly pointed out, when "We the People" determine that the Constitution needs to be amended, then "We the People" are empowered to do so. There is NO Constitutional provision for the Supreme Court to amend or alter the Constitution in any way whatsoever.