Not much posting, but plenty of praying going on. Been thinking about you a lot today.
I bought it with an eye to comparing Peterson's sociopathic traits to Michael Schiavo's. To do that, I have a printed list of the traits (#1905) and am checking them off as I read. Preliminary report -- about half of the traits checked off so far and lots of reading still to do. Michael has been in the spotlight for years whereas Scott Peterson was in the shadows and we know relatively little about him. But he's certainly showing up as that cocky, lying, promiscuous, manipulative, cold cold cold personality with no conscience.
If I'm not mistaken, some of our visitors were active in threads about Peterson and were convinced of his guilt. And that makes me wonder all the more why they side with Michael, a more obvious and much less appealing sociopath?
What's weirdest of all is that not one of them will even discuss the question whether Michael injured Terri in the first place. There is no other explanation on the table and he has no alibi. Why won't they even discuss it? Are they afraid that if they finally face the obvious, they will be seen as having been fools from the beginning?
It may happen anyway, whether they wash their hands first or not. If Michael confesses... if any of eight or ten people with critical information and guilty consciences were to break and spill some beans... the house of cards could come down just-like-that.