I disagree. You mass troops on the Iranian border and I guarantee you can make them blink or blunder into the mistake of doing something overtly hostile. This would allow us to attack them in a very convincing manner. And I think we could do quite a bit of damage to Iran with air power alone. Flattening Tehran would be a good start.
I do not set myself up as a military expert and I would be delighted to be shown to be wrong here if you could only tell me where we can get the forces and the machines and equipment to mount a credible threat of invasion.
Are we talking about intimidating Iran, or annexing Texas?
This tactic simply won't work. For one thing, we occasionally might skirmish now and then with the Iranians. It barely makes the news, much less as an act of war. Second, we don't have a credible force to project into Iran, due to our drained national will, so they have no reason to fear an invasion. Especially on the flimsy grounds your proposing.
Are we talking about intimidating Iran, or annexing Texas?
This tactic simply won't work. For one thing, we occasionally might skirmish now and then with the Iranians. It barely makes the news, much less as an act of war. Second, we don't have a credible force to project into Iran, due to our drained national will, so they have no reason to fear an invasion. Especially on the flimsy grounds your proposing.