Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 21stCenturyFreeThinker

This is very disturbing to me as well, why in the hell are the leakers not being procecuted....unless it is being leaked by "our" side...that too I find despicable.


37 posted on 12/03/2006 4:36:53 AM PST by Tees Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Tees Mom

I am not as distrubed as many on this thread are regarding the "leak" of this memo. TO me it shows that Rummy was working on identifying a change in tactics, but not a change in the overall goal. It shows that the Pentagon was looking at making changes and shows the high level thinking that we know and admire about Rummy. His options are far more expansive than the options of the gang of 10 led by Baker.

I do not see Iraq as a failure and I think history will show it a success, but the success will be hard fought. Something that Bush and Rummy said from day one.

Some are still missing one of the main points about the Iraq war. If we go there, they will follow. Although it has never been stated, at least I haven't heard it addressed, is that WE chose Iraq as the central battle field. We knew if we went in there, the terrorists would follow us. It gave us the opportunty to fight the terrorists out in the open (if you can call guerilla warfare in the open). It is a hard mission, but I believe it will be won. If the dems/media had not turned on america, I believe this would have been much more successful by now. But the dems/media give the terrorists hope by constantly denigrating our President, Rummy, our troops and our mission. When Dick Durbin stands on the Senate floor and calls our troops Nazi's, isn't censured, and then americans vote him into a leadership position -- I shake my head in complete dismay.

If you build it they will come. They did and we are capturing and killing them, we are just not doing it fast enough, or open enough to let the american people see this as part of the overall strategy. There is a reason Iraq was/is billed as part of the WOT.


39 posted on 12/03/2006 5:04:20 AM PST by Laverne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Tees Mom
This is very disturbing to me as well, why in the hell are the leakers not being procecuted.

Both sides enjoy being able to leak sensitive materials for political gain. If this were not the case, legislation would be introduced by either party to stamp out the practice.

In other words, the government turns a blind eye to congressional staffers doing what would put a CIA agent in jail for the rest of his life, because of politics. It's pretty much that simple.

63 posted on 12/03/2006 6:34:18 AM PST by Steel Wolf (As Ibn Warraq said, "There are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Tees Mom
This is very disturbing to me as well, why in the hell are the leaker's not being prosecuted....unless it is being leaked by "our" side...that too I find despicable.
It had to be leaked by someone on "our" side. These memos are between specific senior advisor's and the President. I doubt they're widely circulated.

That said any administration sanctions leaks when it suits them. I can see how the Rumsfeld memo might have helped the Administration but the Hadley memo looks like a total disaster to me.
77 posted on 12/03/2006 2:58:28 PM PST by 21stCenturyFreeThinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson