Posted on 12/02/2006 7:51:20 PM PST by calcowgirl
Setting the stage for a knockdown fight over the fate of four towering Klamath River dams accused of hammering salmon stocks and the West Coast fishing industry, a new government study released Friday has found that decommissioning the dams could cost $100 million less than operating them for another generation.
The economic analysis, ordered by the California Energy Commission in cooperation with the U.S. Department of the Interior, should provide ammunition for Indian tribes, environmentalists and commercial fishermen eager to see the hydropower dams demolished to reopen more than 300 miles of river that have been blocked to migrating salmon for more than half a century.
"It's now official: The Klamath hydro project is an economic loser," said Steve Rothert of the group American Rivers.
The report, produced by a private consulting firm and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's Technical Services Center, found that the cost of demolishing the dams and buying market-rate electricity to offset the lost hydropower over the next three decades would be far less than installing the vast infrastructure and improvements expected to be needed for the dams to win license renewal.
Though the hydro project historically has been able to cheaply deliver enough power for about 70,000 homes, new environmental rules would limit the project's unfettered operation, reducing electricity generation by 23%, the study found.
The cost of erecting fish ladders and other projects to help salmon get past the dams and cure water-quality problems would boost the 30-year cost of the project to between $230 million and $470 million, according to the report.
Removing the dams and buying replacement electricity over the next three decades would cost between $152 million and $277 million ... Depending on the price of power in the future, dam removal could save PacifiCorp ratepayers up to $285 million ...
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
You can download an eBook of the entire experience for FREE HERE
Marsh2 is a County Supervisor of Siskayou County... a huge county bordering OR in far northern CA. It's a beautiful place in which the EnvironMental Communutty recently put a huge amount of it's productive citizens on Welfare from what once was a thriving timber growing and harvesting agricultural industry!!!
You been a FReeper a LONG time!!! Do you have a position on this issue yet?
Oh! And most of all... Thank you for you service in support of your fellow Americans!!!
If you watch real close, you'll see 'em trying desperately to pit the fishing industry against the farming industry. At the close of the last century they were pitting the American Indians and the Sucker Fish against the Klamath potato growers.
Tell me... What are you seeing them do in "going after the fishing industry right now?" Oh! and this is also a battle between the "red voting counties," versus the "blue voting counties! You seem to recognize this with your .communism millionaires and their tax write-offs comment. Yes, they certainly are silent about anything that makes their massive .communism contributors look bad!!!
Put me on your ping list too,... please!!!!
Church labeled green sanctuaryThere is a good background article on Andy Kerr posted at FR:
Portland Business Journal - January 22, 2001The First Unitarian Church of Portland met with PacifiCorp representatives and public officials Sunday to certify its church as a "green sanctuary."
The congregation has pledged to buy PacifiCorp power from renewable energy sources while taking steps to help reduce climate change. Sunday's celebration in the Daisy Bingham Room, 1011 S.W. 12th Ave., offered a series of speakers, information booths and refreshments.
Andy Kerr Wages War on GrowthThe rest of the above thread is worth the read for any newbies to the subject, like me.
By Michelle Cole From the Portland Oregonian, June 4, 2000
I intend to. I posted a link earlier in the thread:
http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=11197393 (304 pages, PDF file, 2.35MB)
This is the same trick perfected in the nuke context: saddle the projects with more and more and more and more and more unjustified costs, and then claim that you can blow up a productive asset and SAVE MONEY.
Could you pick up people like tertiary01 who want to be pinged as I only do pings from memory and am liable to forget at my advanced age!!! OregonRancher asked you for pings back up the road a bit. Just wanted to make sure you caught his request. Our Prop 90 was like there Prop 37. Only thing is... Their Governor didn't "dis" it like our spithead Schwartzenfrauder did our Prop 90!!!
I know, I'm imposing on you, but that's what you git for being so danged GOOD!!!
Uh... (make that "duh"). Yes, I meant Prop 84 is a virtual goldmine, LOL. Thanks.
And we are fed up with Marxist aka Greens getting welfare in the form of our tax money buying millions of acres for their private use. At least farmers return something to us and they employ lots of people...
Yep. I'm collecting a list. You're not imposing, LOL.
I've added OregonRancher, brazzaville, and tertiary01, per their requests.
Suuuuuuuuuuuuper!!! Thanks a bunch!!!
Muy Excellente! You have found another very interesting link - Pacificorp working with Andy Kerr's church, which will buy "renewable energy" through the "Blue Sky" program - which is a partner for Andy Kerr's "Larch Company" - which provides "renewable energy". Hmmmm.
It merits further investigation...
First you make it economically difficult to produce, then you stop the production because it is economically (too) difficult.
Democra(t)cy at work.
Oh, yeah, we'll find those more economical "market-rate electricity" sources when we need them...after the farmers shut up...after it's too damn late...then we'll find them.
Sure we will.
Please add me to the ping list. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.