Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

"And THAT frill accomplishes exactly what??? A slip of paper left in the hand of the voter does squat to protect the integrity of the balloting process. A paper ballot sealed inside the machine which can be hand counted does.

OK, let's go over this again. When I voted last, I did so electronically. As I completed the voting process, a receipt printed and REMAINED INSIDE THE MACHINE. I was able to view my selecions, on paper, through a small glass window.

That is THE definition of a paper trail, is it not? Please, question liberals at every turn. What they are spouting about electronic voting is largely BS.


38 posted on 12/03/2006 6:15:32 AM PST by L98Fiero (The media as a self-licking ice-cream cone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: L98Fiero; Bob
"OK, let's go over this again. When I voted last, I did so electronically. As I completed the voting process, a receipt printed and REMAINED INSIDE THE MACHINE. I was able to view my selecions, on paper, through a small glass window."

That is different from my understanding of the process, which was that the "receipt" was printed out and left with the voter rather than stored internally. As I recall, NO story I have seen about touch-screen voting has mentioned this rather critical key point.

If that's the way it works, and a paper hard copy is sealed within the machine, then I have no objections.

41 posted on 12/03/2006 7:40:59 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson