Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: period end of story
I'll review the ones I am familiar with since I can speak with authority about these. You can't be claiming that Weiner doesn't trash Bush and Rumsfeld? These things are not matters of opinion. They are facts. Deal with it. Your guy says stupid things because he's a hothead. Denying facts is a tactic liberals and communists employ. Everyone should be held accountable for what they say including Michael Weiner.

On his Nov 20, 2006 show, Weiner hosted a love-in with Charlie Rangel.

TRUE. I heard it.

On his Nov 17, 2006 show, Weiner played a clip from some Israeli pot smokers and then extrapolated from this clip that all of Israel have become drug addicts.

TRUE. I heard it. I donated that one.

On his Nov 17, 2006 show, Weiner said that drug addicts should be executed.

TRUE. I heard it. I donated that one also.

Twice hosted Chuck Schumer in a blatant attempt to damage the GOP Senate Campaigns during an election year.

TRUE. I heard it.

Routinely calls our fellow Americans' morons and idiots

TRUE. I've heard it numerous times. That's Weiner.

Thinks the multinational corporations conspire with each other. Thinks the oil companies conspire with each other

TRUE. During the gas price increases this summer he claimed this. Not only that but he claimed Bush fixed it so the prices came down before the election. (One wonders if Bush has so much power why he let the prices rise in the first place)

Hate Conservative icons like Rush Limbaugh

True. He attacks Rush Limbaugh almost daily.

Spews hatred and vile towards our Commander in Chief

Yes. TRUE. Trashes Bush almost daily.

Called Repeatedly for Rumsfeld's firing

Yes. True. I've heard this many times. Not only that but he said we should be on the lookup for the next job Rumsfeld lands in the private sector - in some foreign country. In effect he called Rumsfeld a traitor and that he would take a job somewhere and sell us out.

Routinely asks callers a question, then ignores their answer and continues on maniacal rant.

TRUE. Happens every day.

Said the war in Iraq is purely for profit, get this, so that Haliburton can make money.

TRUE. I've heard this many times. He thinks the war in Iraq is to serve the military industrial complex like Haliburton. Little difference between him and liberals on this point.

Said there's no difference between the GOP and Dems.

Yes. TRUE. He says this routinely on his show.

Said it won't be so bad if Dems take over, outside of some minor social changes, nothing else will really change.

TRUE. Yep. I heard this.

He believes that the Clintons and Bush family have developed some sort of consortium and political syndicate together. For the next several years, they will stiff-arm the rest of the political world and alternate family members to the Presidency. Hillary is next, then followed by Jeb.

Yep. TRUE. I herad this one claimed by him several times.

128 posted on 12/01/2006 8:44:55 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]


To: plain talk

Great post.

Don't expect a reasonable response.


149 posted on 12/02/2006 1:05:48 AM PST by Checkers ("...(play) outside in the sun all day...or...sit at your computer and do something that matters.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

To: plain talk

Criticising: Bush/Rummy/Limbaugh/Cheney/the Bush 1- B. Clinton relationship/War in Iraq,... is part of a talker's job.

Mike has praised ALL of the above at one time or another as well.

Examples. Bush on the Schiavo case, Rummy at the start of the war, called Rush "the aircraft carrier of the conservative movement"(when Rush had the pill problem),Cheney's smarts and toughness,....

He praises/criticizes when deserved. (not much praise lately though)

As for your contributions to the "list": that's Mike, sometimes it's commentary mixed with showmanship. Surely you can tell when he's exaggerating for effect, especially when a commercial break is coming. Sometimes it's good, and sometimes it misses the mark.

Finally,if you really wanted to represent Mike's show fairly, you would include EVERY statement Mike makes, on a so-called "list." But you don't.

Case closed.


160 posted on 12/02/2006 6:08:47 AM PST by period end of story (Phil Hendrie is a plant of Phil Hendrie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson