Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ieatfrijoles

Bill was viewed as a candidate for POTUS long before 1992, because he was a politics prodigy. It was even an election issue the last year he ran for Governor of AR. He was also fortunate to run in a year when other Democrats were scared to run against GHWB.


62 posted on 12/01/2006 12:49:33 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative

Looking back now, I can see that Bill had the WH in his sights all along. But as a reasonably informed San Franciscan I knew nothing about him. Heck I was even reading the Chronicle in those days and you can't be any more informed than that.


67 posted on 12/01/2006 12:55:57 PM PST by Ieatfrijoles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative
True. Also, Pat Buchanan hurt Bush badly in the primaries. Sitting Presidents seldom have to deal with a strong challenge within their own party. Those who do generally end up getting killed in the general election, and Perot (whom I still think worked out a deal with Clinton) campaigned specifically to siphon off the disgruntled Republicans.

Will we ever see another Reagan? I wish we would, but you only get about one of those a century, and we're barely into this one. Interestingly enough, Reagan is always listed as a social conservative, but he didn't enact an agenda of social conservatism, he led by example. I remember Reagan, and his primary agendas were building a powerful military and reducing the size of government and governmental regulations. Under Bush, the Department of Homeland Security has become a behemoth. Working in the fire service, I can tell you flatly that the FEDS are in the process of nationalizing the fire service. I cannot keep up with all the new FEMA and OSHA directives.

I do not see anyone calling for a strong military, smaller government, and less regulation. Both parties want to be Big Brother, and I honestly don't know who to support anymore.

142 posted on 12/01/2006 7:21:54 PM PST by Richard Kimball (I get no respect. I went to the proctologist and he put his finger in my mouth - Rodney Dangerfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson