Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: libbylu
I'm anti-amnesty and I'm neutral on Romney. I have nothing against him, but I have little reason to be for him either.

As of today, December 1, 2006 - the three Republican contenders are McCain, Giuliani and Romney. Duncan Hunter is not yet at that level (sorry, but he simply doesn't have the visibility). McCain is far too mentally inconsistent. That leaves Giuliani and Romney. Giuliani has visibility and good ratings with the voters at large (sorry Rudy-haters, but he does) - Romney doesn't have that (yet). If we assume that Hillary is the Democrat nominee, surely the best idea is find who is going to be well placed to kill her off?

Regards, Ivan

96 posted on 12/01/2006 8:49:44 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: MadIvan

I really like Newt, Hunter is a good man but likely not viable, McCain may as well be a democrat, Rudy scares me on his very pro amnesty stance, I like that Romney has the courage to be anti-amnesty, McCain is the only one i couldn't consider. And I don't think Tancredo is a nut.


104 posted on 12/01/2006 9:09:50 AM PST by libbylu (" a clearer voice of conservatism and I think Mitt Romney has an opportunity to fill that" Newt G)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson