Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge says road ban applies to oil and gas exploration in forests
AP via SFGate ^ | 11/30/6 | TERENCE CHEA

Posted on 11/30/2006 4:54:22 PM PST by SmithL

San Francisco -- A federal judge ruled that a Clinton-era ban on road construction in national forests applies to hundreds of oil and gas leases sold by the Bush administration.

U.S. District Judge Elizabeth Laporte's ruling Wednesday means that holders of more than 300 leases that permit oil and gas exploration in national forests cannot build roads to access those areas.

Laporte's order follows her September ruling that reinstated the 2001 "Roadless Rule" that prohibits logging, mining and other development on 58.5 million acres of pristine wilderness in 38 states and Puerto Rico.

In that earlier ruling, Laporte said the Bush administration had failed to conduct necessary environmental studies before it replaced the rule in May 2005 with a process that required governors to petition the federal government to protect national forests in their states.

She sided with 20 environmental groups and four states — California, New Mexico, Oregon and Washington — that had sued the Forest Service over the changes.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; energy; naturalgas; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2006 4:54:27 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Good thing we don't need that energy.


2 posted on 11/30/2006 4:55:33 PM PST by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
"58.5 million acres of pristine wilderness in 38 states "

It's only pristine if you fly over it in an airplane. Otherwise no one sees it.

yitbos

3 posted on 11/30/2006 4:58:04 PM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

We literally face wars of extinction that are related to the need for Middle East oil but the leftists are shutting the spigots everywhere. They are strangling us.


4 posted on 11/30/2006 4:58:15 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is exactly the kind of ruling the people of the US want, or they wouldn't have voted to give control of congress to the democrats.


5 posted on 11/30/2006 4:58:52 PM PST by aomagrat (I'm not as young as I usedtocould.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; Grampa Dave; Steely Tom
The Pelican Brief

6 posted on 11/30/2006 4:59:31 PM PST by devolve ( .................always shop, invest, & hire wisely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

No it doesn't.


7 posted on 11/30/2006 5:01:02 PM PST by airborne (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Jesus is the reason for the season!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What is the logic behind this ruling?? That an ex-President's Executive Order overrides the current President's Executive Order. What an idiot.


8 posted on 11/30/2006 5:01:38 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Hmmm, I've read quite a few of John Grisham's books can't recall the exact scenario in that one now. I need to look for his latest books.


9 posted on 11/30/2006 5:07:48 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

honestly, if you ask people, they would say that this was a good ruling because they instinctively oppose drilling and mining in national forests

but then they will whine and complain that gas prices are too high as well


10 posted on 11/30/2006 5:08:06 PM PST by ChurtleDawg (kill em all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I am assuming that it was an executive order by Clinton that set up the protection in the first place. So, now you have the judiciary ruling on a change to an E.O.(or a new EO) and requiring an impact study even though no such impact studies were required in the first EO to setup the protection that the second EO was trying to alter.
11 posted on 11/30/2006 5:08:59 PM PST by crazyhorse691 (The faithful will keep their heads down, their powder dry and hammer at the enemies flanks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

If OPEC ain't paying these yahoos, they should be.


12 posted on 11/30/2006 5:09:51 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The RINO presidential field says it has "solutions"..."solutions" are solids watered down to nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
That is debatable. No one on the Repub. side right now is a champion of energy independence. Is there a 5/10 year plan to be off of ME oil? Is the President on TV right now encouraging the private sector to build refineries?

I would hope so. Kinda National Security. At the very least we could give private enterprises huge tax incentives to build new infrastructure and other needs. I just don't see it getting done and it's been a long time since 9/11. Seems like a great issue for the Repubs to run on in 08.
13 posted on 11/30/2006 5:12:09 PM PST by FLOutdoorsman (One man with courage is a majority.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The biggest obstacle to our natural resources is our own government.


14 posted on 11/30/2006 5:13:31 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Laporte ruled that leaseholders cannot build roads in those areas, but did not rule out other ways to access the land.

What are you supposed to do ? Teleport, via Star Trek

15 posted on 11/30/2006 5:14:13 PM PST by Popman ("What I was doing wasn't living, it was dying. I really think God had better plans for me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The Democratic Congress can pass an embargo on foreign petroleum. Price controls will ensure that the oil companies do not profit from the resultant shortages. Distinguished members of Congress, illegal aliens, and professional welfare recipients will get first priority on any available petroleum products. Congress will impose a declining annual quota on the energy use of all other Americans (except seniors) to ensure compliance with the Kyoto Stone Age Restoration Treaty and to reduce gas lines. Various other laws will restrict or forbid new energy exploration and continued production of existing oil and gas wells and coal mines. The military certainly gets last priority on any remaining petroleum products.

That's the Democrats' energy strategy. The Republicans' strategy consists largely of tax subsidies, clock manipulation, and pork-barrel spending. Few Distinguished members of Congress in either House or in either party seriously contemplate the serious issues of our times, and almost none dare propose consideration of any potentially difficult solution; witness the rapid demise of the vaunted Social Security reform plan and the general ambivalence even among Republicans to Islamofascist terrorism.


16 posted on 11/30/2006 5:14:20 PM PST by dufekin (The media-Democrat-terrorist complex--espionage, sedition, propaganda, treason, and surrender)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: potlatch


The plot follows the sudden room temp assumed by several SCOTUS Justices

O'Connor, Ginsberg, and Breyer all want Judges be immune from any criticism in Congress or by American citizens

They lefties become little Stalins/Hitlers in SCOTUS








17 posted on 11/30/2006 5:16:59 PM PST by devolve ( .................always shop, invest, & hire wisely)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: devolve
lefties become little Stalins/Hitlers in SCOTUS

That's for sure!

18 posted on 11/30/2006 5:19:37 PM PST by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Popman
What are you supposed to do ? Teleport, via Star Trek

You can parachute in, but then you have to walk out or else live there for the rest of your life.

19 posted on 11/30/2006 5:22:06 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Democracy: The worst form of government, except for all the others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

In that earlier ruling, Laporte said the Bush administration had failed to conduct necessary environmental studies before it replaced the rule in May 2005 with a process that required governors to petition the federal government to protect national forests in their states.

And Clinton conducted real studies before establishing the original rule?


20 posted on 11/30/2006 5:25:16 PM PST by freedomfiter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson