To: SirLinksalot
So much for challenging and exploring the prevalent scientific theories of the day.....
2 posted on
11/30/2006 7:47:02 AM PST by
padre35
(We are surrounded, that simplifies our problem Chesty Puller)
To: SirLinksalot
First Question:
Hey Charles, care to explain this?
3 posted on
11/30/2006 7:54:20 AM PST by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: SirLinksalot
Darwin has been tested constantly and relentlessly for 148 years nonstop and has passed every single rigorous test without fail. What this particular teacher wants to do is deprive her students of an honest education in science by wasting their classroom time indoctrinating them with her personal superstitious beliefs about magic designers in the sky while using idiot logic quotes from the same small handful of completely bogus charlatans all the rest of the anti-science Luddites are quoting. She should be charged with child abuse and put in a slammer.
4 posted on
11/30/2006 7:56:20 AM PST by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: SirLinksalot
real science like climate change This guy has no bias ... 10 to 1 he supports the man-made global warming envirowackos with the same lack of scientific basis.
6 posted on
11/30/2006 8:01:12 AM PST by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: SirLinksalot
He added: "There's little enough time with the school curriculum to deal with real science like climate change, energy and the weather. Yeah, right. "Real" science like humans can reverse global warming, we're running out of oil tomorrow and Bush caused Katrina.
Do kids have a chance these days just to do basic biology, chemistry and physics???
To: metmom
Directing your attention to the structure of the article.
Note the similarity of style to the WND article that you had commented on.
27 posted on
11/30/2006 12:03:43 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Atheist and Fool are synonyms; Evolution is where fools hide from the sunrise)
To: SirLinksalot
'ID' is not needed to seen that evolution has enough problems to doubt its veracity.
I hear that the kids eat this stuff up (the controversy)in the schools, and many of them are bringing it up themselves.
I think the Internet, and free access to all sorts of information is driving much of this renaissance.
In years past all you were shown is the conclusions and findings of the author stated as absolute unassailable conclusion, whether that was a drawing of a lungfish or other fish crawling out of the water then becoming a salamander/or primitive reptile, a couple of moths glued to some bark, a nice set of ink drawings falsely representing various embryos, a nice flow chart of ancient horses, or an imaginative 'hominid' scraped up from fragments of bone found scattered across an African plain.
35 posted on
11/30/2006 12:53:20 PM PST by
RunningWolf
(2-1 Cav 1975)
To: SirLinksalot
‘You know what I love about you guys?. You have Charles Darwin on your money. That would never happen in America..’
—US comedian Rich Hall
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson