Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1 in every 32 U.S. adults behind bars, on probation or on parole in 2005
The Daily Mail ^ | 30th November 2006

Posted on 11/30/2006 2:04:02 AM PST by Mrs Ivan

A record 7 million people - or one in every 32 American adults - were behind bars, on probation or on parole by the end of last year, according to the Justice Department.

Of those, 2.2 million were in prison or jail, an increase of 2.7 per cent over the previous year, according to a report.

More than 4.1 million people were on probation and 784,208 were on parole at the end of 2005. Prison releases are increasing, but admissions are increasing more.

Men still far outnumber women in prisons and jails, but the female population is growing faster. Over the past year, the female population in state or federal prison increased 2.6 per cent while the number of male inmates rose 1.9 per cent. By year's end, 7 per cent of all inmates were women. The gender figures do not include inmates in local jails.

"Today's figures fail to capture incarceration's impact on the thousands of children left behind by mothers in prison," Marc Mauer, the executive director of the Sentencing Project, a Washington-based group supporting criminal justice reform, said in a statement. "Misguided policies that create harsher sentences for nonviolent drug offenses are disproportionately responsible for the increasing rates of women in prisons and jails."

From 1995 to 2003, inmates in federal prison for drug offences have accounted for 49 per cent of total prison population growth.

The numbers are from the annual report from the Justice Department's Bureau of Justice Statistics. The report breaks down inmate populations for state and federal prisons and local jails.

Racial disparities among prisoners persist. In the 25-29 age group, 8.1 per cent of black men - about one in 13 - are incarcerated, compared with 2.6 per cent of Hispanic men and 1.1 per cent of white men. And it's not much different among women. By the end of 2005, black women were more than twice as likely as Hispanics and over three times as likely as white women to be in prison.

Certain states saw more significant changes in prison population. In South Dakota, the number of inmates increased 11 per cent over the past year, more than any other state. Montana and Kentucky were next in line with increases of 10.4 per cent and 7.9 per cent, respectively. Georgia had the biggest decrease, losing 4.6 per cent, followed by Maryland with a 2.4 per cent decrease and Louisiana with a 2.3 per cent drop.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: goodstart; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
Is this truw?
1 posted on 11/30/2006 2:04:05 AM PST by Mrs Ivan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

Yep.


2 posted on 11/30/2006 2:06:44 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan
Let's not worry about the lock-up...

let's worry about who they let out.

3 posted on 11/30/2006 2:06:58 AM PST by Nitro (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

" 1 in every 32 U.S. adults behind bars, on probation or on parole in 2005 "
"Is this truw?"

I can't confirm the exact numbers, Mrs. I, but it's entirely believable....

The "Land of the free, and the home of the brave" is moving ever closer to the Orwellian state where "everything that's not required is forbidden" -- and so an ever-increasing number of us are, techincally, criminals.

I used to use a tagline that read: "The most dangerous phrase in the English language: 'There oughtta be a law'" --

"How do you boil a frog?"


4 posted on 11/30/2006 2:12:53 AM PST by Uncle Ike ("Tripping over the lines connecting all of the dots"... [FReeper Pinz-n-needlez])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

This is also extremely expensive. It costs something like $45,000 a year per prisoner.


5 posted on 11/30/2006 2:14:39 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

Law enforcement doing what it's supposed to. A good start.


6 posted on 11/30/2006 2:14:51 AM PST by Fierce Allegiance ( <h2>SAY NO TO RUDY! I know how to spell, I just type like s#it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

I'd like to know how many of them are REALLY US Citizens...not ones with really good forged papers, using another identity or child of a alien resident, legal or not.


7 posted on 11/30/2006 2:29:03 AM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell
It costs something like $45,000 a year per prisoner.

I just did the maths! That is a HUGE sum of money!

I cannot help thinking that it would be rather more economic to introduce alternative punishments that would be a real deterrant - hanging and flogging, for example.

8 posted on 11/30/2006 2:33:40 AM PST by Mrs Ivan (English, and damned proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike

Some posters are beginning to sound like the New York Times: "Crime rates are down, so why are so many people in prison?"

Hint: Social "scientists" haven't figured out a way to "reform" criminals to prevent recidivism. But while locked up, criminals cannot repeat their antisocial, criminal behavior. So locking up criminals prevents crime by those criminals who are locked up. Do we agree?


9 posted on 11/30/2006 2:35:52 AM PST by Cincinnatus.45-70 (Patriotism to DemocRats is like sunlight to Dracula.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus.45-70

the law must be discriminatory towards male! Its sexist!


10 posted on 11/30/2006 2:38:53 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus.45-70

I wonder how many FReepers are behind bars as compared to being in one?


11 posted on 11/30/2006 2:38:58 AM PST by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus.45-70

" So locking up criminals prevents crime by those criminals who are locked up. Do we agree?"

We agree, as long as we can agree on a definition of "criminal"....

If you define "criminal" as "someone who does direct, material, and provable harm to the person or property of another", then we're in complete agreement...

If you go by the increasintly prevalent definiton of "anybody who does something I don't like, or who by word, thought, deed, or very existence, offends me", then we're on completely different pages.....


12 posted on 11/30/2006 2:41:05 AM PST by Uncle Ike ("Tripping over the lines connecting all of the dots"... [FReeper Pinz-n-needlez])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

Hanging and flogging are cruel and unusual -- even when the person is an enthusiastic participant.

There are entire communities that are economically dependent on prison systems. Essentially it's an industry.

The key is to keep people from committing crimes in the first place.


13 posted on 11/30/2006 2:41:11 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

How many of those incarcerated are American citizens? A goodly portion of them are Mexican criminals.


14 posted on 11/30/2006 2:46:15 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: durasell
I find this odd. I know many people. Hundreds and I can only think of one who was ever in jail for a night and that case was thrown out.
15 posted on 11/30/2006 2:47:31 AM PST by Pacothecat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib; AZRepublican
I'd like to know how many of them are REALLY US Citizens

How many of those incarcerated are American citizens?

Very good questions!

16 posted on 11/30/2006 2:48:49 AM PST by Mrs Ivan (English, and damned proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cincinnatus.45-70
Hint: Social "scientists" haven't figured out a way to "reform" criminals to prevent recidivism. But while locked up, criminals cannot repeat their antisocial, criminal behavior. So locking up criminals prevents crime by those criminals who are locked up. Do we agree?

****************

We certainly do.

17 posted on 11/30/2006 2:51:44 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pacothecat

Criminals are concentrated among poor segments of the population. I haven't seen the numbers, but I would bet that crime/prison populations have increased in areas where workfare programs were instituted.


18 posted on 11/30/2006 2:52:23 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

We can try harder...


19 posted on 11/30/2006 2:53:30 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan


Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) DOJ
20 posted on 11/30/2006 2:53:52 AM PST by Pro-Bush (hater)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson