Replies

Score 1 for the investors!!!

1 posted on 11/30/2006 12:33:44 AM PST by xtinct

To: xtinct

good ruling

2 posted on 11/30/2006 12:55:39 AM PST by 4rcane

To: xtinct

"Score 1 for the investors"

I would guess that by the time the Lawyers take their "share", the investors will be lucky to get $.50 on the dollar.....

3 posted on 11/30/2006 1:58:37 AM PST by traditional1

To: xtinct

Score 1 for the investors!!!

No, score 1 for the lawyers.

After their legal fees, court costs and every other conceivable "marked up" charge they could throw into the pot, the investors lose big-time.

4 posted on 11/30/2006 4:44:35 AM PST by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)

To: xtinct

OK, so the judge agrees. I guess that implies that people from whom the money comes also agree. Or else.

5 posted on 11/30/2006 5:44:15 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (* nuke * the * jihad *)

To: xtinct

Score 1 for the investors!!!

Score one for the enemies of personal responsibility. Both in the boardroom and with the Fidelity electronic trading accounts.

6 posted on 11/30/2006 5:45:12 AM PST by the invisib1e hand (* nuke * the * jihad *)

To: xtinct

))))U.S. Judge Denise Cote ---- Nominated by William J. Clinton on April 26, 1994((((

How many judges did Willard appoint in '94? Seems like thousands?!?

'Series', every time I check it's almost like 'appointed by Clinton, 1994'.

7 posted on 11/30/2006 5:54:41 AM PST by Condor51 (Tagline Under Construction - Kindly Wear Your Hardhat)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794