Replies

I suspect Bush's refusal to stanch the Latin flood is because he fears a Mexican revolution if we don't drain off the disaffected population. So we are getting the restless millions here. At some point I think those millions will realize that conversion to Islam will give them Aztlan from the Rio Grande to Kennebunk. Then we will go to 40-100 million saracens in a couple of years and sharia will be a looming presence.

"I suspect Bush's refusal to stanch the Latin flood is because he fears a Mexican revolution if we don't drain off the disaffected population. So we are getting the restless millions here. At some point I think those millions will realize that conversion to Islam will give them Aztlan from the Rio Grande to Kennebunk. Then we will go to 40-100 million saracens in a couple of years and sharia will be a looming presence."

I doubt that they will convert to Islam, it took centuries to convert them to Christianity (and still effectively hasnt millions of them to this day). The immigration issue will come to a head pretty soon -- probably the next President will be the one that promises to close the borders (and probably drive out a large number of the illegals already here, as well).

"I suspect Bush's refusal to stanch the Latin flood"

I apologize for hijacking this thread, it's a good one and I've read many interesting things but given the expertise I've seen here perhaps there is a level of understanding here that can confirm/dispute a theory.

I have to think that with the native US very close to a sub-replacement rate we're in the same boat as old Europe. They've tried to save their bacon by importing muslims and it doesn't seem to be working out too well for them either culturally or economically.

Japan won't bend and I think a very strong argument that the economic condition in Japan over the last decade could be the first population decline recession/depression in modern history. Indeed there are other factors, but still...

"We" are doing it with Mexicans and while it is causing problems in perspective with the solutions of other countries they're actually quite mild.

I'd appreciate criticism on this theory, I can't prove it and maybe I'm just grasping at straws trying to come up with any justification I can for the refusal of Washington to address the border problem.