Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

The "shock value" of this idea relies on misusing the term "universe." By definition, there is only one universe. To speak of "multiple universes" necessarily involves a new, different meaning of "universe."

Of course, the same fate befell the term "world."

My prediction: This new meaning of "universe" will eventually come to be accepted as its canonical meaning, and some new term will have to be adopted with the same meaning as the term "universe" had originally.


8 posted on 11/29/2006 4:34:11 PM PST by sourcery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

You're right, it does open one hell of a can of worms. The metaphysics of it all is mind-boggling. Philosophers' heads are probably exploding as they read this.


13 posted on 11/29/2006 4:44:24 PM PST by lesser_satan (EKTHELTHIOR!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery

The principle that there can be no possible communication between these bubbles allows each to be treated as an independent universe with different physical laws. A universe then would be a region with a particular set of physical laws.


22 posted on 11/29/2006 4:52:33 PM PST by RightWhale (RTRA DLQS GSCW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery
The "shock value" of this idea relies on misusing the term "universe." By definition, there is only one universe. To speak of "multiple universes" necessarily involves a new, different meaning of "universe." Of course, the same fate befell the term "world."

As more extra-solar planets are discovered, "solar system" is also similarly misused.

63 posted on 11/29/2006 8:54:43 PM PST by johnpannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson