Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NEPA

So, was this guy (and yourself) subject to random urinalysis to determine if you've been smoking? Did the entire workforce agree to that, or did Scotts say they'd just do it?


46 posted on 11/29/2006 4:04:22 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Mariner
The testing wasn't random. (BTW I'm not covered by Scotts insurance so I'm not subject to the policy.) Employee's had 1 year notice and the offer to pay for any stop smoking program they wanted.

Chances are if they run it like the drug testing, people won't be tested again unless they're off work for a couple months and then come back.

If this guy was smart he would have quit a few weeks before testing and probably would have been home free for the duration of his employment.

60 posted on 11/29/2006 4:22:13 PM PST by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson