Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Unfairness of a “Fairer” Economy
NRO ^ | November 28, 2006 8:22 AM | John Tamny

Posted on 11/29/2006 11:13:22 AM PST by .cnI redruM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
A liberal's idea of equality is no one achieving anything. They remind me of "The Handicapper General" from the Kurt Vonnegut story Harrison Bergeron.
1 posted on 11/29/2006 11:13:23 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
access to the stock market is the best and fairest equalizer of wealth.

Yes, it's open to one and all- you, your Aunt Mary, your pal Pedro- everyone. Do a little homework, set up some DRIPS and let 'em ride.

2 posted on 11/29/2006 11:19:58 AM PST by Nascar Dad (Liberals, Libertarians, Losers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I always did love hearing about how unfair it is that most workers incomes have stagnated, and then not mention how they blocked people from diverting a very tiny percentage of there FICA taxes into private accounts where investments regularly outpace wage growth by a wide margin making everyone richer and better off. Why this was not mentioned during the campaign by our side I do not know.
3 posted on 11/29/2006 11:21:10 AM PST by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

I can make the economy more fair: When they raise my taxes, I'll quit working, and appear to the tax man more like the poor.


4 posted on 11/29/2006 11:24:33 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (Osama Wins!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

This guy misses one with the 401(K) example. Distributions of 401(K)'s are taxed at ordinary income rates (and may include penalties for early distributions), not capital gain rates (one of the trade-offs for tax deferal). Otherwise he makes some sound points.


5 posted on 11/29/2006 11:27:07 AM PST by shawnlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM

One thing I learned from a very good Professor. High taxes control the people. When people have less control over their own money, the government can easily control them. If taxes are raised on corporations, corporations raise the price for their goods. The people will pay again when purchasing those goods. As for the poor, we will always have the poor. Always have, always will....nothing will change that.


6 posted on 11/29/2006 11:34:29 AM PST by Ron2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: shawnlaw
This guy misses one with the 401(K) example. Distributions of 401(K)'s are taxed at ordinary income rates

He didn't say anything about the tax rate on 401Ks. His point is that Dems attack the lower rate on capital gains and dividends, lower rates that make stocks more valuable, at the same time they want more "little people" to invest in stocks.

8 posted on 11/29/2006 11:41:33 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EricBlair11

Do you have any suggestions or just vague hints of class envy?


9 posted on 11/29/2006 11:47:19 AM PST by RebelBanker (It is, however somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EricBlair11

"one of the qualities of a democracy is equality between individuals"
Not so. The function of a democracy is to allow freedom of individuals to participate equally in the political arena. Has nothing to do with economic arena.

"it is affecting all of us"
I don't care if one person has a lot more than me. In a free society, I can work with proper incentives to become rich as well as I may desire. You make the common mistake of thinking wealth is a big pie. Wealth can be created in many ways by some or many of us.


10 posted on 11/29/2006 11:52:59 AM PST by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EricBlair11

That may indeed be true, but there is a reason for that. In my personal experience, if I apply myself and do my job I get rewarded. My pay has tripled in 6 years, because I have improved at what I do.

I don't expect society to care of me. I go into the game expecting them to try and screw me over. I take care of myself and suggest that others do likewise.

The one intelligent thing Oprah! ever had to say was that luck was where opportunity met preparation. We cannot expect anyone else to do it for us. It will never be fair until you grab it by the Jimmies and make it be fair.


11 posted on 11/29/2006 11:55:13 AM PST by .cnI redruM (2008 is another day and another battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EricBlair11
We are all created equal but we do not end up being equal. You, for instance, might be a miseducated lazy moron who never amounts to anything, and is always financially poor, whereas I might work hard and save money and end up well off.

There now, you try to finish up elementary school, and try to go further.

12 posted on 11/29/2006 11:56:54 AM PST by mallardx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I work my ass off to get ahead, the government takes half of it and spends in on pork projects and give aways to people who didn't earn it.

"Fairer" my left butt cheek. The heck with tea, next tax revolt I'm tossing legislators into the Harbor.

13 posted on 11/29/2006 11:57:38 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EricBlair11
I doubt anyone surfing this website is in the top 5% of income

Top 5% is only a $166,000 household income. Why does that $166,000 household affect those making less?

Remember one of the qualities of a democracy is equality between individuals,

How is taxing that rich family at 35% equal to charging a poor family 10% on their income?

and with money playing the largest role in who gets elected in this country that means political power is moving to the top in our society

That's why John Kerry won in 2004, he was the richest candidate.

14 posted on 11/29/2006 11:58:31 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EricBlair11

We aren't a "democracy". We are a Republic. My mine is mine, not yours. Enforcing either the current oligarchy, or on the other hand the socialist utopoia you describe, is equally as wrong.


15 posted on 11/29/2006 11:59:28 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Anyone who needs to be persuaded to be free, doesn't deserve to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EricBlair11
I doubt anyone surfing this website is in the top 5% of income so that means this is affecting you and I

Don't be too sure about that. You'd be surprised at just how low a figure the top 5% of income earners, is. I know that I was.

If I remember right, it was somewhere around $125,000/year for married couples....I'm sure that the numbers are somewhere on the IRS's website.

Anyhoo, I always get a kick out of liberals that rail on about the evil rich top 5% (or 10%, or whatever), without knowing how close they themselves are to that particular class.

16 posted on 11/29/2006 12:03:05 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse

I'll cc. you on what I told the other guy on post 11. It seems to address your points fairly well...

"The one intelligent thing Oprah! ever had to say was that luck was where opportunity met preparation. We cannot expect anyone else to do it for us. It will never be fair until you grab it by the Jimmies and make it be fair."


17 posted on 11/29/2006 12:03:37 PM PST by .cnI redruM (2008 is another day and another battle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Your quoting "political power is moving to the top"

And, we should point out the theory which says that many of the people who have the most come from families that worked the hardest and smartest. They are better choices to run our political system than some lazy, ignorant bum selected off a downtown street or some high-school dropout on drugs. Look what happened when those guys voted in this last election...


18 posted on 11/29/2006 12:04:14 PM PST by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Top 5% is only a $166,000 household income. Why does that $166,000 household affect those making less?

Thanks for the numbers, I was digging for them. I still think that's low, in comparison to the way people talk about 'the rich'. Heck, there are some parts of the country where that people would be hard pressed to get by on that salary.

19 posted on 11/29/2006 12:05:28 PM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wbill
Historical Income Tables - Households
20 posted on 11/29/2006 12:07:32 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson