Skip to comments.
When mommy goes off to war, it's rough on kids [sickening]
The Seattle Times ^
| 11/28/06
| Donna St. George
Posted on 11/29/2006 8:36:31 AM PST by XR7
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 301-302 next last
To: Antoninus
61
posted on
11/29/2006 9:12:43 AM PST
by
Allegra
(Can't Talk Now...I'm Busy Looking for That Civil War the Media Keeps Talking About)
To: sauropod
Be careful of the words you use. "abandoning" is a loaded word and unfair to use in this instance.************
Let me guess-First Amendment fan?
62
posted on
11/29/2006 9:14:36 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: XR7
Furthermore, to force a Muslim man to strip naked before a foreign woman is to humiliate him beyond Arab imagination. If it has been established that he's affiliated with the terrorists and reasonably likely to have useful information, after having had a fair opportunity to make a case that he's just an innocent bystander grabbed by mistake, I simply don't see the problem with that.
63
posted on
11/29/2006 9:15:22 AM PST
by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: Stone Mountain
Besides, what if the mother was widowed? *************
Then she's a widow.
64
posted on
11/29/2006 9:16:15 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: MudPuppy
Wonder why "dad" couldn't watch the kids while she was gone? Maybe because "dad" shouldn't be trusted to watch anything more sentient than a goldfish, and that's why he's no longer in the picture?
65
posted on
11/29/2006 9:17:32 AM PST
by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: XR7
An Army that should be men.Absolutley, but there was a story in Army Times the other day where the Army's head of diversity (or some such-a bird colonel) called for allowing more women in the combat arms so that more minorities would be promoted to higher officer rank.
Frankly, females will find themselves assigned to combat units a lor more often thanks to the "plug and play" concept of transformation. Many maneuver units are losing combat support elements-like the support and maintenance platoons. Those needs will be filled by randomly assigning support and maintenance units that are not "organic" to the combat units. Since those units can have females assigned, more females will end up in combat units.
66
posted on
11/29/2006 9:17:41 AM PST
by
91B
(God made man, Sam Colt made men equal)
To: LetsRok
Single-mothers are selfish whores.The woman in question is a mother who is divorced.
For all we know, she is divorced for no fault of her own, but because her husband left her for another woman or some other reason.
She volunteered to serve her country. She served honorably.
Have you served in the military? Do you really believe that people who volunteer for military service are selfish people?
BTW, I know a woman who is a single mother who has never been married and she has one child. She served in Iraq for a tour while her daughter stayed with her parents.
The woman in question is a God-fearing patriot who has raised a wonderful little girl who is fiercely proud of her mother's service.
And I am proud to call her a friend.
67
posted on
11/29/2006 9:18:02 AM PST
by
wideawake
("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
To: sauropod
How is she "abandoning" her children? They are staying with her mother, right? Be careful of the words you use. "abandoning" is a loaded word and unfair to use in this instance.
I disagree. A mother's first responsibility should be to her minor children. Grandparents should become caretakers of their grandchildren only in the event of serious disability, indigence, or death of the parent. For a single mother to abandon her children to serve overseas in the military is not laudatory. That our system is currently set up to allow such travesties demonstrates the moral vaccuum that afflicts much of our society today.
68
posted on
11/29/2006 9:18:05 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(When your party's platform is "Vote for US because THEY will be worse," prepare to lose.)
To: trisham
Just an observer of what slanted language does to an argument. I was merely calling attention to the language the poster was usingh and calling him on it.
You got a problem with that?
69
posted on
11/29/2006 9:18:29 AM PST
by
sauropod
("Come have some pie with me.")
To: Allegra
You give me the creeps.
Why, because I disagree with you? How can someone who has been all over the world be so intellectually cloistered?
70
posted on
11/29/2006 9:20:00 AM PST
by
Antoninus
(When your party's platform is "Vote for US because THEY will be worse," prepare to lose.)
To: 91B
Ahh yes. "Transformation."
Not a good thing IMO and one of Rummy's biggest failings.
71
posted on
11/29/2006 9:20:18 AM PST
by
sauropod
("Come have some pie with me.")
To: Antoninus
You might want to try reading the article. Your "indigence" bullet point is in there:
Her National Guard duty, with the 129th Signal Battalion, brought in extra money. Her ex-husband paid child support. Still, she only scraped by, with the help of public assistance.
72
posted on
11/29/2006 9:21:19 AM PST
by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: sauropod
Just an observer of what slanted language does to an argument. I was merely calling attention to the language the poster was usingh and calling him on it. You got a problem with that?
************
"Slanted language" is an interesting term. It's you who has a problem with the speech of others, not me. Curious that you would begrudge others their speech, then defend your own right to it.
73
posted on
11/29/2006 9:21:57 AM PST
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wideawake
Do you really believe that people who volunteer for military service are selfish people?
She is selfish because she is a "single mother". It has nothing to do with her military service. My definition of a "single-mother" is a woman who has children out of wedlock and has no intention of giving their bastard a father.
74
posted on
11/29/2006 9:22:14 AM PST
by
LetsRok
To: LetsRok
Just to clarify ... you're simply trying to say that many people (wrongly) consider single mothers to be "selfish whores" -- not that you personally consider the two terms to be interchangeable, right?
To: Antoninus
Why, because I disagree with you? No, because you're so nasty and spiteful and rude and seem to have such a very large chip on your shoulder.
You should seek professional help. Seriously.
76
posted on
11/29/2006 9:23:37 AM PST
by
Allegra
(Can't Talk Now...I'm Busy Looking for That Civil War the Media Keeps Talking About)
To: Antoninus
Without knowing more about her situation, such as her financial situation and that of her grandparents, and the reasons that went into her signing up, I don't think you can make such a sweeping statement such as "a mother's first responsibility should be to her minor children."
Maybe her signing up to get the pay and health benefits for her family IS fulfilling her "first responsibility. It just so happens that her job calls for deployment every so often.
I'd rather she be serving her country instead of a ward of the state, wouldn't you?
77
posted on
11/29/2006 9:23:43 AM PST
by
sauropod
("Come have some pie with me.")
To: billbears
I don't know why she signed up in the National Guard but I bet when she did she didn't envision going off to fight the war of the purple finger either I bet she didn't. She just saw a free ride on the backs of taxpayers.
Soldiers, on occasion, are sent away to WAR. Like it or not, being a Soldier is what she signed up for. If she did not like doing the WORK for the money, she should have stayed on public assistance and kept her LEGS CLOSED!
To: traditional1
you prefer the less flattering names? How bout the kids? Wanta call them less flattering names?
79
posted on
11/29/2006 9:24:41 AM PST
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: trisham
I begrudge using the term "abandon" when her child is in her family's care.
I don't quite get how that is "abandonment." Maybe you could break out the Crayola's and help me out, eh?
80
posted on
11/29/2006 9:26:40 AM PST
by
sauropod
("Come have some pie with me.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 301-302 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson