And who had a hand in writing that EO in such a way that it could be interpreted as being too vague? Could it have been Alberto Gonzalez? Or maybe Harriett Meiers?
I'm just sayin' . . . .
It's all Bush's fault!
Couldn't you perhaps spare a bit of disdain for the JUDGE?
You don't know what you're talking about. This has NOTHING to do with President Bush.
Ashroft was AG back then when these designations came out, if I'm not mistaken.
Unconstitutionally vague is often another way of saying they can find no specific reason to toss out the law or order, so they say it's to vague.
Bush should simply reissue the executive order worded in a different way that is "less vague".
Then they get the justice department, the terrorists, and the judge can go through the whole process again, and if the Judge still thinks it's too vague Bush might even be able to do it yet another time before he leaves office.
After that it's in the hands of the next President. Hopefully voters will choose well.
"And who had a hand in writing that EO in such a way that it could be interpreted as being too vague? Could it have been Alberto Gonzalez? Or maybe Harriett Meiers?
I'm just sayin' . . . ."
What kills me is that this socialist bum judge actually thinks the Constitution protects foreign organizations. Foreign organizations have no rights under the Constitution. It's a FOR US CITIZENS ONLY contract.