Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Walters: Governor's next goal -- Senate?
Sacramento Bee ^ | 11/28/6 | Dan Walters

Posted on 11/28/2006 8:10:47 AM PST by SmithL

To national political observers, Arnold Schwarzenegger's landslide re-election as California's Republican governor was nothing short of miraculous, given the state's generally Democratic leanings, the Democratic tide that swept over the rest of the nation and Schwarzenegger's very low popularity when the year began.

Schwarzenegger is touting his win as reflecting a new political paradigm -- centrism and bipartisanship -- that should be emulated at the national level. He established new genres in bodybuilding and movies and implies that he's doing it again in politics (just a year after trumpeting anti-politician populism as his shtick, it should be noted). "Well, it's basically being fiscally conservative, being socially moderate and you know, being environmentally progressive," Schwarzenegger said Sunday on NBC's "Meet the Press."

A more nuanced view would be that his election stemmed from four factors: an apology for his failed ballot measure drive in 2005, thus re-establishing centrist credentials for independent voters; his extraordinary good luck in having the cooperation of Democratic legislators to establish a record of accomplishment; his error-free campaign; and more good luck in having a Democratic opponent who shot himself in the foot and kept pulling the trigger.

Nevertheless, Schwarzenegger begins his second term on a high note and is advancing a fairly ambitious agenda, topped by extending health care coverage, that he says will exploit the new spirit of bipartisan cooperation in the Capitol. It's much too early to judge whether that spirit exists and will generate real progress or whether what happened this year was merely an aberration. But politics being what they are, it's not too early to begin speculating on what may lie ahead for Schwarzenegger.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: governator; schwarzenegger; senatator

1 posted on 11/28/2006 8:10:49 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Well, anything to the right of Boxer will be an improvement. But then just about everybody is to the right of Boxer.


2 posted on 11/28/2006 8:12:35 AM PST by Michael.SF. (Note: Sell Diebold Stock.................NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Hey, on a scale of one to ten, Schwarzenegger would be a 2 or 3 point improvement over Boxer.

From 1 to 3 or 4.


3 posted on 11/28/2006 8:13:31 AM PST by Paloma_55 (I may be a hateful bigot, but I still love you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

NO MORE RINOS, VOTE FOR BOXER


4 posted on 11/28/2006 8:18:38 AM PST by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I can't imagine Arnold wanting to be one of a hundred.


5 posted on 11/28/2006 8:23:46 AM PST by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Schwarzenegger is touting his win as reflecting a new political paradigm -- centrism and bipartisanship

Gag...Gag...BARF!!!


6 posted on 11/28/2006 8:26:56 AM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paloma_55

7 posted on 11/28/2006 8:28:04 AM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It is what it is, Arnold probably is the best we can do in California.


8 posted on 11/28/2006 8:29:54 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Your right, Arnold is about as good as we can get. But I think it would be a let down for him. Not enough power. I do not see it.


9 posted on 11/28/2006 9:12:40 AM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

To national political observers, Arnold Schwarzenegger's landslide re-election as California's Republican governor was nothing short of miraculous

not in my neighborhood. nightmare is more like it.


10 posted on 11/28/2006 9:29:34 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I guess that would mean he would be caucusing with the dems and his Uncle. He's so in their pocket anyway.

Don't laugh, he did nothing, zilch for the GOP candidate this year. Let the (M)ilk refute that little tidbit.


11 posted on 11/28/2006 9:30:17 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Cornyn / Kyl in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Oh yeah, 6 more years of a real Quisling in Babs. That'll work. I will vote for Arnie just to get back the Senate in Pub hands if possible. Babs is a danger to the Republic. Arnie is just a get along guy who hasn't a philosophy which will actually harm the Republic.


12 posted on 11/28/2006 9:33:35 AM PST by phillyfanatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Don't laugh, he did nothing, zilch for the GOP candidate this year.

Agreed, but if the choice is between Boxer or Schwarzenegger, I'll vote for Schwarzenegger. Every time.

13 posted on 11/28/2006 10:37:42 AM PST by SmithL (Where are we going? . . . . And why are we in this handbasket????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I'd vote for my cat before babs, but Arnold should run on the democrat ticket and end the charade


14 posted on 11/28/2006 12:04:09 PM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

You're so predictable. ;-)

I doubt we will be asked to make that choice.. Personally, none of the above seems more appropriate were it offered..

It's not a question of being disenfranchised, when has the Ca GOP done much to support anyone the last few elections anway, quite frankly.

Apathy can be contagious and to be expected and a real shame when a party chooses to encourage it by offering a socialist as their pick to run against another socialist.

You know who wins that one in the end and it isn't this country or this state, imo.


15 posted on 11/28/2006 12:14:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... Kyl /Cornyn in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
A more nuanced view would be that his election stemmed from four factors:...

A more honest view would be 1) that the CA GOP pre-empted a primary election eliminating any competition from the right, 2) Schwarzenegger co-opted the Democrat platform cutting his opponent off at the knees and 3) Schwarzenegger totally abandoned the GOP platform while touting Democrat accomplishments as bi-partisan accomplishments to embellish his record.

16 posted on 11/28/2006 3:08:41 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

I'm wondering if Arnie and his democrat buddies (Núñez, et al) might jointly embrace new laws on term limits giving Arnold an opportunity to extend his governorship until 2014. They are creating quite a machine with the current leadership.


17 posted on 11/28/2006 3:13:35 PM PST by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson