This is the third thread I've seen on this the last couple days. I hadn't realized until now that it was an informant, not an undercover policeman, who is alleged to have bought drugs at that address. Big difference.
You didn't know because the police have changed their story.
This is the third thread I've seen on this the last couple days. I hadn't realized until now that it was an informant, not an undercover policeman, who is alleged to have bought drugs at that address. Big difference.
Let me get this straight. An undercover cop is to be trusted but a citizen informant is not to be trusted. Why would you trust a cop since they rely on citizen informants that aren't to be trusted. You got some irrational circular "logic" thing going on there.