Posted on 11/27/2006 2:00:34 PM PST by Risha
Is Putin Being Set Up?
by Patrick J. Buchanan Posted Nov 27, 2006
PARIS—Whoever poisoned Alexander Litvinenko had two goals: a long and lingering death for the KGB defector and pointing a finger of accusation for his killing right in the face of Vladimir Putin.
Which leads me to believe Putin had nothing to do with it.
In an assassination, one must ask: Cui bono? To whose benefit? Who would gain from the poisoning of Litvinenko?
Certainly not Putin. Litvinenko's death puts him, the Kremlin and the KGB, now the FSB, under suspicion of having reverted to the terror tactics of Stalin, who commissioned killers to liquidate enemies like Leon Trotsky, murdered in Mexico in 1940.
What benefit could Putin conceivably realize from the London killing of an enemy of his regime, who had just become a British citizen? Why would the Russian president, at the peak of his popularity, with his regime awash in oil revenue and himself playing a strong hand in world politics, risk a breach with every Western nation by ordering the public murder of a man who was more of a nuisance than a threat to his regime?
Litvinenko, after all, made his sensational charges against the Kremlin—that the KGB blew up the Moscow apartment buildings, not Chechen terrorists, as a casus belli for a war on Chechnya and that he had refused a KGB order to assassinate oligarch Boris Berezovsky— in the late 1990s. Of late, Litvinenko has been regarded as a less and less credible figure, with his charges of KGB involvement in 9-11 and complicity in the Danish cartoons mocking Muhammad that ignited the Muslim firestorm.
Yet, listening to some Western pundits on the BBC and Fox News, one would think Putin himself poisoned Litvinenko. Who else, they ask, could have acquired polonium 210, the rare radioactive substance used to kill Litvinenko? Who else had the motive to eliminate the ex-agent who had dedicated his life to exposing the crimes of the Kremlin?
Indeed, no sooner had Litvinenko expired than his collaborator in anti-Putin politics, Alex Goldfarb, was in front of the television cameras reading Litvinenko's deathbed statement charging Putin with murder:
"You may succeed in silencing one man, but the howl of protest from around the world will reverberate, Mr. Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life. ... You may succeed in silencing me, but that silence comes at a price. You have shown yourself to be as barbaric and ruthless as your most hostile critics have claimed."
Litvinenko's statement is awfully coherent and eloquent for a man writhing in a death agony. But if he did not write it, who did? All of which leads me to conclude Putin is being set up, framed for a crime he did not commit. But then, if Putin did not order the killing, who did?
Who else could have acquired the polonium 210? Who else would kill Litvinenko to make Putin a pariah? These are the questions Scotland Yard, which also seems skeptical that Putin had a hand in this bizarre business, has begun to ask.
As the predictable effect of Litvinenko's death has been to put a cloud of suspicion over Putin and a chill over Russian relations with the West, one must ask: To whose benefit is the discrediting of Putin? Who would seek a renewal of the Cold War?
Certainly, the oligarchs and robber barons like Berezovsky—many of them now dispossessed of the wealth they amassed in a collapsing Soviet Union, and all of whom have been run out of the country or imprisoned—have the most powerful of motives. They hate Putin and seek to bring him down. And Goldfarb and Litvinenko both enjoyed the patronage of the billionaire Berezovsky.
Surely, rogue or retired KGB agents, passed over by Putin and bitter at Litvinenko, would have a motive: to send a message, written in polonium 210, that this is what happens to those who betray us and Mother Russia.
Scotland Yard has yet to declare this a murder case and is looking into the possibility of a "martyrdom operation"—suicide dressed up like murder—in which Litvinenko may have colluded. The Putin-dominated Russian press is pushing this line, as well as the idea of an oligarchs' plot to discredit Putin and destroy Russia's relations with the West.
Yet Litvinenko was still in his early 40s, with a wife and two children. While his agonizing public death would make him a celebrity even more famous than Georgi Markov, the Bulgarian anti-communist murdered in London in 1979 with a poison-tipped umbrella, Litvinenko would not be around to enjoy his fame.
America has a vital interest in this Scotland Yard investigation. What it discovers may tell us more about the character of the man into whose eyes George Bush claimed to have stared, and seen his soul, or it may tell us who the real enemies of this country are, who are out to restart the Cold War, and perhaps another hot one.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2006 HUMAN EVENTS. All Rights Reserved.
If you came to the same conclusion, lie down until the fever dreams go away and rational thought returns.
As I noted in my previous message, this "logic" implies that Georgi Markov was actually murdered by the CIA or somebody in order to frame the Soviet government.
Next? He's been saying that for some time already.
I hear that Pat's next column will describe how Julius Caesar managed to stab himself a dozen times.
But, unlike Buchanin, Putin is a Neo-Communist who wants to dominate the world.==
How you get to such conclusion?:) If you know his policy you wouldn't tell such stupid thing. Putin wnats the Russia mighty grows economically. He does everything to get it.
Why would the Russian president, at the peak of his popularity, with his regime awash in oil revenue and himself playing a strong hand in world politics, risk a breach with every Western nation by ordering the public murder of a man who was more of a nuisance than a threat to his regime? ==
Very good question. Litvinenko was indeed just near zero nuisance and no threat for Russia. He is more harming for Putin dead then alive.
Pat has said that a long time ago.
Thanks for that information. (So many morons, so little time.)
Obviously, either the article by Litvinenko is true or he hates Putin. Litvinenko's article does appear to be based on speculation.
What other moonbat theories does Buchanan harbor? I haven't paid any attention to him in years.
I really hate to agree with Buchanan, but he may be right. Seems to me if Putin wanted this guy dead, he could've simply had him disappear or something.
They'll be searching the golf courses together all next week.
Yes! YES!
The bitch set him up.
The Pootster, IS being compromised because of his firm stand against:
The JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSS.
The Zionist conspiracy got wise to the brave and selfless stand against them and has decided to attack this heroic soldier of the Motherland.
it's chilly in here. hand me my tinfoil hat, please.
The most notorious example is his flirtation with Holocaust denial (raising a bogus and irrelevant claim that "diesel fumes" are incapable of killing people).
Geez. He really is loopy.
Whoever poisoned Alexander Litvinenko had two goals: a long and lingering death for the KGB defector and pointing a finger of accusation for his killing right in the face of Vladimir Putin. Which leads me to believe Putin had nothing to do with it.Who benefits indeed from dissenters and freethinkers getting offed using polonium from Russian gov't nuclear plants? Vlad Putin.
The KGB agent Putin is a saint. And Churchill caused the Holocaust. And Buchanan is under medicated. He is rewritting history, poorly, or current political ends. Fine if you are a leftist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.