Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabramerican
Let me try to explain it to you one more time. The truth of the story is not the issue. The reflex hypocrite reaction of some posters to the story they believed was the issue.

Had it been Clintons daughter I would have given the same response as I did in this thread. The issue was National Security up till post 242 I think it was.

They messed up. They know they messed up by cheering the girls on to act irresponsibly in light of what was then assumed to be a dangerous situation. For 241 post it was assumed to be true by most posters. All they can do now is giggle and say but it wasn't true tee hee hee.

329 posted on 11/27/2006 7:14:44 PM PST by cva66snipe (If it was wrong for Clinton why do some support it for Bush? Party over nation destroys the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies ]


To: cva66snipe; donna
My first post was 155 and I doubted the story. In post 162, I posted further doubt because it made no sense at all.

Most of the posts prior to that were arguing with ditzy donna who called them "Ugly Americans."

Just setting the record straight here.

333 posted on 11/27/2006 7:20:17 PM PST by ohioWfan (President Bush - courageously and honorably protecting us in dangerous times, . Praise the Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson