Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Logophile

Well, there were also no laws protecting people from discrimination based on race before the Civil Rights Act, and I'd suspect that most people would agree that those laws were needed.


405 posted on 11/27/2006 8:42:40 PM PST by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 402 | View Replies ]


To: Accygirl
Well, there were also no laws protecting people from discrimination based on race before the Civil Rights Act, and I'd suspect that most people would agree that those laws were needed.

Even if most people would agree, it is intellectually sloppy to equate the treatment of blacks with the treatment of women. You cannot say that because laws against racial discrimination are needed, laws against sex discrimination are needed as well.

But that was not even my main point. You characterized the 1950s as a major step backwards for women because of choices those women themselves made. Why is that?

407 posted on 11/27/2006 8:53:06 PM PST by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson